MHB Cot (60°) = 1/tan (60°) = 1/sqrt{3}

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz_1965
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Cotangent of 60° equals 1/tan(60°), which simplifies to 1/sqrt{3}. The discussion centers on the preference for avoiding square roots in the denominator of fractions, as it can complicate addition or subtraction of fractions. While having a square root in the denominator isn't inherently problematic, rationalizing it can simplify calculations. Understanding both methods is beneficial for mathematical proficiency. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the balance between mathematical conventions and practical ease in calculations.
xyz_1965
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I know that cot (60°) = 1/tan (60°) = 1/sqrt{3}.

Why can't we just leave it as it is? I guess my question is more about algebra than trig.

Yes, my algebra 2 days are far behind. However, back in my algebra 2 days, I never quite understood why math teachers have a problem with square roots in the denominator of a fraction.

What's so bad about a (number)/sqrt{number}?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's not the worst thing in the world but it is easier to add or subtract fractions with integer denominators.

However, there are times when it is a good idea to rationalize the numerator. It is a good idea to know how to do it either way!
 
Country Boy said:
It's not the worst thing in the world but it is easier to add or subtract fractions with integer denominators.

However, there are times when it is a good idea to rationalize the numerator. It is a good idea to know how to do it either way!
Understood. Thanks.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top