- #1
- 3,732
- 1,853
Starting off 3 weeks ago today:
I was at home, and noticed a new "floater" in my left eye. It was unusual as it was black, and then seemed to dissipate.
Then a bit later, it was like someone had drawn a scribbled doodle with black ink in my field of vision. It also dissipated, but left my vision cloudy in that eye.
I called the eye clinic, and they said they'd leave a message to have a nurse call me back.
3 hrs pass, and no call back. We decided to just go in person on the hope they could fit me in.
After talking to a nurse, they were able to set me up with a optometrist to check out my eye, and the Dr. determined that I had a tear in my retina.
She went out to grab a ophthalmologist, but it being late in the day by now, they had all left. She was however able to phone the one that was on-call, and he agreed to come in that evening. After going out to grab a quick bite, we returned, and met up with him. A short exam and a ten minute laser eye surgery later, I was good to go.
I had a follow up appointment early last week, and everything looks good. It will be a while before all the junk in my my eye completely clears out, but I have already seen significant improvement.
Then, a bit over a week ago, my wife and I got back my DNA test results. I was not really expecting to learn anything new, but my wife was hoping she might.
Her results came back, to her disappointment, with no surprises.
Mine however:
While for the most part was pretty much what I expected, predominately Finnish and some Scandinavian( for clarity, Finns are not Scandinavian) , and was even able to pin down regions within Finland from which I know my Grandparents were from, there was one unusual result:
2% Inuit!
That seemed so way off base that I initially assumed it was noise.
But then after some reflection, I began to reconsider. For one, I thought I remembered a migration map that showed a group branching off from the main group that went on to become the Inuit. This branch kind of looped back towards the Nordic countries. In addition, there is a indigenous population in the Northern parts of Finland, Sweden, and Norway, the Sámi. After a bit of research concerning similarities between the Inuit and Sámi, the answer I got was "biologically indistinguishable".
On top of that, my Dad's father was born ~80 miles South of the Arctic circle and very near traditionally Sámi lands (Lapland to English speakers, but Sámpi to the Sámi)
So, it is not unreasonable to think that the 2% Inuit result was actually detecting Sámi in my DNA
I was at home, and noticed a new "floater" in my left eye. It was unusual as it was black, and then seemed to dissipate.
Then a bit later, it was like someone had drawn a scribbled doodle with black ink in my field of vision. It also dissipated, but left my vision cloudy in that eye.
I called the eye clinic, and they said they'd leave a message to have a nurse call me back.
3 hrs pass, and no call back. We decided to just go in person on the hope they could fit me in.
After talking to a nurse, they were able to set me up with a optometrist to check out my eye, and the Dr. determined that I had a tear in my retina.
She went out to grab a ophthalmologist, but it being late in the day by now, they had all left. She was however able to phone the one that was on-call, and he agreed to come in that evening. After going out to grab a quick bite, we returned, and met up with him. A short exam and a ten minute laser eye surgery later, I was good to go.
I had a follow up appointment early last week, and everything looks good. It will be a while before all the junk in my my eye completely clears out, but I have already seen significant improvement.
Then, a bit over a week ago, my wife and I got back my DNA test results. I was not really expecting to learn anything new, but my wife was hoping she might.
Her results came back, to her disappointment, with no surprises.
Mine however:
While for the most part was pretty much what I expected, predominately Finnish and some Scandinavian( for clarity, Finns are not Scandinavian) , and was even able to pin down regions within Finland from which I know my Grandparents were from, there was one unusual result:
2% Inuit!
That seemed so way off base that I initially assumed it was noise.
But then after some reflection, I began to reconsider. For one, I thought I remembered a migration map that showed a group branching off from the main group that went on to become the Inuit. This branch kind of looped back towards the Nordic countries. In addition, there is a indigenous population in the Northern parts of Finland, Sweden, and Norway, the Sámi. After a bit of research concerning similarities between the Inuit and Sámi, the answer I got was "biologically indistinguishable".
On top of that, my Dad's father was born ~80 miles South of the Arctic circle and very near traditionally Sámi lands (Lapland to English speakers, but Sámpi to the Sámi)
So, it is not unreasonable to think that the 2% Inuit result was actually detecting Sámi in my DNA