- #1
ensabah6
- 695
- 0
could second and third generation SM particles NOT be fundamental?
since they are unstable and rapidly decay, could second and third generation SM particles NOT be fundamental? perhaps as bound states of more fundamental first generation particles?
if they are not fundamental, then do we have to worry about SUSY partners of these?
since they are unstable and rapidly decay, could second and third generation SM particles NOT be fundamental? perhaps as bound states of more fundamental first generation particles?
if they are not fundamental, then do we have to worry about SUSY partners of these?