Could Tachyons Discredit Relativity?

  • I
  • Thread starter BadgerBadger92
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Relativity
In summary: Give that Wikipedia makes clear that ##0 < c < \infty##, this illustrates rather that @MathematicalPhysicist is an unreliable source.
  • #1
BadgerBadger92
149
77
I hear these massless and hypothetical particles could travel faster than light, would that prove relativity wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Tachyons are not massless.

No, they would not violate relativity per se. They would violate causality.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dale
  • #3
Orodruin said:
No, they would not violate relativity per se. They would violate causality.
Sorry for that mistake.

What if the self consistency principle was real and not violate causality?
 
  • #4
The easiest way to accommodate tachyons in relativity without breaking causality is to posit a preferred frame in which tachyons never travel backwards in time. The choice of frame is consequence-free for non-tachyonic physics, so is just the Lorentz Ether Theory interpretation of relativity, but rules out causal paradoxes such as the tachyonic anti-telephone.

The other obvious way to do it is to note that we require theories to obey causality because our observation is that causality is never violated. If we were to observe tachyons allowing causality violations, we'd have to change that requirement.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and Demystifier
  • #5
Interestingly the second postulate doesn't say if c is finite or infinite, at least according to wiki:
As measured in any inertial frame of reference, light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c that is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body. Or: the speed of light in free space has the same value c in all inertial frames of reference.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postulates_of_special_relativity
 
  • Skeptical
Likes weirdoguy
  • #6
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Interestingly the second postulate doesn't say if c is finite or infinite, at least according to wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postulates_of_special_relativity
I think it is understood that when it says definite value it means finite. Otherwise it is imprecise and needs an edit to make it clearer.
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72
  • #7
MathematicalPhysicist said:
at least according to wiki
Which just illustrates that Wikipedia is not a reliable source.
 
  • #8
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, weirdoguy and Motore

FAQ: Could Tachyons Discredit Relativity?

What are tachyons and how do they relate to relativity?

Tachyons are hypothetical particles that travel faster than the speed of light. They are predicted by certain theories in physics, but have not been observed or confirmed. The concept of tachyons challenges the principles of relativity, which state that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.

How could tachyons discredit relativity?

If tachyons were proven to exist and travel faster than the speed of light, it would contradict the fundamental principles of relativity. This could potentially discredit the theory and require a new understanding of the laws of physics.

Is there any evidence for the existence of tachyons?

Currently, there is no concrete evidence for the existence of tachyons. Some experiments have suggested the possibility of particles traveling faster than light, but these results have not been replicated or confirmed.

How are scientists researching the concept of tachyons?

Scientists are using theoretical models and mathematical equations to explore the concept of tachyons and their potential effects on relativity. Some are also conducting experiments to try and detect the presence of tachyons.

What would be the implications if tachyons were proven to exist?

If tachyons were proven to exist and travel faster than light, it would have significant implications for our understanding of the laws of physics. It could potentially lead to a complete reworking of the principles of relativity and open up new possibilities for space travel and time travel.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
668
Replies
1
Views
927
Back
Top