A Counting on a computing system

thidmir
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
I'm looking for any references on a device that is capable of counting over the set of natural numbers
It is plretty clear that a classical computer can't count over the set of natural numbers. If it is a digital device and you used an infinite loop you would eventually run out of memory space and have to reinterpret the meaning of the numbers (so it isn't really counting independently). An analog device can't either because even if you had an analog function like 1/n, you would need a sensitive enough detector to distinguish large enough values of n which goes against the Uncertainty principle. I've heard of some people trying to develop a machine that can count up to (though not including) infinity but does anyone know of any specific references?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot physically count all the natural numbers. You can only do it mathematically.
 
thidmir said:
I've heard of some people trying to develop a machine that can count up to (though not including) infinity
It would count up to ##\infty - 1##? How is that even possible? What is the value of ##\infty - 1##?

A machine that would count to ##\infty - 1## would never stop until the end of time. And, at that time, couldn't we say that if it was built just 1 second earlier, or could have counted a little bit faster, that it could have counted at least one extra number?
 
thidmir said:
I've heard of some people trying to develop a machine that can count up to (though not including) infinity
I have not, so I'd be grateful for any links ...

Your theme is quite interesting, though. But it makes me wonder: what exactly is counting? After a while just pronouncing the numbers would take endlessly long, so would it go towards an infinity squared business?
And how much is infinity minus half of that? So how long to count that?

## \ ##
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
thidmir said:
I've heard of some people trying to develop a machine that can count up to (though not including) infinity but does anyone know of any specific references?
If you've "heard of" it then you should be able to give at least one specific reference. If you can't, and apparently you can't, then we don't have a valid basis for discussion.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top