Critique of relativistic cosmology

In summary, relativistic cosmology is a theory that explains the structure and evolution of the universe based on Einstein's theory of general relativity. The purpose of critiquing it is to evaluate its validity and accuracy, and some common criticisms include the lack of understanding of dark matter and energy and the need for additional assumptions. It differs from other cosmological theories by incorporating gravity and the concept of spacetime. A successful critique could lead to new theories and a better understanding of fundamental concepts.
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
arXiv:0901.1956 [ps, pdf, other]
Title: A Critique of the relativistic cosmology
Authors: R. K. Thakur
Comments: 8 pages, Comments welcome
Subjects: General Physics (physics.gen-ph)
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
On the left hand side of Einstein's equations is the structure of space-time. On the right hand side is matter. If the matter is expanding, then so is space-time. Simple as that.
 
  • #3
It's interesting to see the list of references - most of them are back in the 1920's. I think the author really needs to read some more up to date papers
 

FAQ: Critique of relativistic cosmology

What is relativistic cosmology?

Relativistic cosmology is a scientific theory that describes the large-scale structure and evolution of the universe. It is based on the principles of Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity, which states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in all frames of reference.

What is the purpose of a critique of relativistic cosmology?

The purpose of a critique of relativistic cosmology is to analyze and evaluate the validity and accuracy of the theory. This involves examining its assumptions, predictions, and evidence, and identifying any potential flaws or limitations.

What are some common criticisms of relativistic cosmology?

Some common criticisms of relativistic cosmology include the lack of a complete understanding of dark matter and dark energy, the inability to explain the observed acceleration of the expansion of the universe, and the need for additional parameters and assumptions to make the theory fit observations.

How does relativistic cosmology differ from other theories of cosmology?

Relativistic cosmology differs from other theories of cosmology, such as Newtonian cosmology, in that it takes into account the effects of gravity on the structure and evolution of the universe. It also incorporates the concept of spacetime, where space and time are considered as a single entity, rather than separate entities as in Newtonian physics.

What are some potential implications of a successful critique of relativistic cosmology?

If a successful critique of relativistic cosmology were to be made, it could potentially lead to the development of new theories or modifications to existing theories to better explain the structure and evolution of the universe. It could also have implications for our understanding of fundamental concepts such as gravity and the nature of space and time.

Similar threads

I Exploring Galaxy Evolution in μ¨ Based Cosmologies
Replies
7
Views
2K
B Hip Replacements and Weather Sensitivity
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Exploring ΛCDM Model: Cosmology Intertwined in 4 Pre-Prints
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Why Does Cosmic Growth End and Why Is Our Era Unique?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Exploring the Cosmological Constant Problem & Zero-Point Energy
3
Replies
92
Views
5K
B Cosmological constant vis-a-vis dynamical vacuum: bold challenging the ΛCDM
Replies
5
Views
2K
Baryon oscillation peak a cosmological standard ruler
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Higgs inflation and primordial black holes
Replies
1
Views
1K
B Is Dark Matter a Misunderstood Global Effect?
Replies
13
Views
3K
I Is There a Preferred Axis in Cosmology and What Could Be Its Origin?
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top