MHB CTS and show the roots in this form

  • Thread starter Thread starter ai93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Roots
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the quadratic equation $$x^{2}-8x-29=0$$ using the completing the square (CTS) method. After applying CTS, the equation simplifies to $$(x-4)^2 - 45 = 0$$. The next steps involve isolating the square, leading to $$x - 4 = \pm 3\sqrt{5}$$. This results in the roots being expressed as $$x = 4 \pm 3\sqrt{5}$$, confirming the required form of c$$\pm$$d$$\sqrt{5}$$. The conversation highlights the effectiveness of the CTS method in solving quadratic equations.
ai93
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I have to show the roots of $$x^{2}-8x-29=0$$ are c$$\pm$$d$$\sqrt{5}$$

I used completing the square method. Once I used CTS I got the answer
$$(x-4)^2-45=0$$ So I am not sure what is the next step to put it in the form of c$$\pm$$d$$\sqrt{5}$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathsheadache said:
I have to show the roots of $$x^{2}-8x-29=0$$ are c$$\pm$$d$$\sqrt{5}$$

I used completing the square method. Once I used CTS I got the answer
$$(x-4)^2-45=0$$ So I am not sure what is the next step to put it in the form of c$$\pm$$d$$\sqrt{5}$$

$$(x-4)^2=45 \Rightarrow x-4= \pm \sqrt{45} \Rightarrow x-4=\pm \sqrt{9 \cdot 5} \Rightarrow x-4=\pm 3 \sqrt{5} \Rightarrow x=4 \pm 3 \sqrt{5}$$
 
Hello, mathsheadache!

I have to show the roots of: $$\:x^2-8x-29\:=\:0\:$$ are [math]\:c\pm d\sqrt{5}[/math]

I used completing the square method.
Once I used CTS I got the answer: $$\;(x-4)^2-45\:=\:0$$

So I am not sure what is the next step to put it in the form of [math]c\pm d \sqrt{5}[/math]
What is the purpose of CTS? . . . To solve for [math]x\,![/math]

[math](x-4)^2 - 45 \;=\;0[/math]

[math]\qquad(x-4)^2 \;=\; 45[/math]

[math]\qquad\quad x-4 \;=\;\pm\sqrt{45}[/math]

[math]\qquad\quad x-4 \;=\;\pm3 \sqrt{5}[/math]

[math]\qquad\qquad\;\, x \;=\;4 \pm 3\sqrt{5}[/math]
 
evinda said:
$$(x-4)^2=45 \Rightarrow x-4= \pm \sqrt{45} \Rightarrow x-4=\pm \sqrt{9 \cdot 5} \Rightarrow x-4=\pm 3 \sqrt{5} \Rightarrow x=4 \pm 3 \sqrt{5}$$

Thanks this really helped!
 
soroban said:
Hello, mathsheadache!


What is the purpose of CTS? . . . To solve for [math]x\,![/math]

[math](x-4)^2 - 45 \;=\;0[/math]

[math]\qquad(x-4)^2 \;=\; 45[/math]

[math]\qquad\quad x-4 \;=\;\pm\sqrt{45}[/math]

[math]\qquad\quad x-4 \;=\;\pm3 \sqrt{5}[/math]

[math]\qquad\qquad\;\, x \;=\;4 \pm 3\sqrt{5}[/math]

Cheers, you make the question look easier than it is!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top