- #1
ProPM
- 66
- 0
Hi,
I have the following population figures for a five year interval:
554.8, 609, 657.5, 729.2, 830.7, 927.8, 998.9, 1070, 1155.3, 1220.5
The graph has an exponential growth from the first value to the fourth value and then the population starts to decay.
I found that a Cubic Regression best illustrates these figures but I have to describe it and, since I've never worked with them I am a bit wary.
Is it correct to say that the cubic correctly illustrates the initial exponential growth of the population but also manages to reflect the leveling off of the population in the latter segment of the plot?
Thanks
I have the following population figures for a five year interval:
554.8, 609, 657.5, 729.2, 830.7, 927.8, 998.9, 1070, 1155.3, 1220.5
The graph has an exponential growth from the first value to the fourth value and then the population starts to decay.
I found that a Cubic Regression best illustrates these figures but I have to describe it and, since I've never worked with them I am a bit wary.
Is it correct to say that the cubic correctly illustrates the initial exponential growth of the population but also manages to reflect the leveling off of the population in the latter segment of the plot?
Thanks