Current density from charge density?

In summary, it would be nice to be able to derive a current from the charge density, without having to resort to the point-charge-velocity model.
  • #1
jjustinn
164
3
In statistical mechanics, a probability current (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_current) can be derived from the probability amplitude via

ψ*ψ,i - ψψ*,i (i=x,y,z)

...and it would be nice or any number of reasons to be able to do the same thing with a non-probability "charge"/current -- to take the archetypical example, electric charge/current.

The usual electrodynamic literature defines current as the (four-) velocity of a point charge times its charge, but that obviously doesn't work if you're not dealing with localized point particles -- but it seems like given the time-dependence of the charge density across space, this could be done, just like it's done for probability current.

I thought I had a non-covariant solution -- the gradient of the time-change of the density:
Ji = (ρ,t),i

For example, take a point charge at the origin at t=0, that moves to x = 1 at t=1. So Δρ is +1 at x=1, and -1 at x=0, and the gradient points to the right, giving at least something proportional to the expected current-density.

However, this turns out to basically be a re-phrasing of the point-charge-velocity model, except even less usable--say you have a "line charge" (or a line of charges) between x=0 and x=10, moving with a constant velocity along the x-axis. In that case, the Δρ (ρ,t at the limit), and therefore the current density, will be 0 except at the ends, while this is obviously the type of current we are most familiar with.

So, is this a fool's errand, because charges are fundamentally particular? But if that's the case, what about other locally-conserved properties, like energy/momentum currents in non-particulate matter (or fields)? Perhaps the answer is that in those cases, the only measurable "current" really is at the ends (where the absolute "charge" is changing, rather than merely "moving"), because there's nothing like the magnetic field in these cases, where the "current" is the source of a field in its own right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What about the simple [itex]\vec{j}=\rho \cdot \vec{v}[/itex] with the average velocity v of your charges?
There is no classical analogon to your quantum-mechanical formula. You cannot derive the current density from the charge density alone.
 
  • #3
mfb said:
What about the simple [itex]\vec{j}=\rho \cdot \vec{v}[/itex] with the average velocity v of your charges?
There is no classical analogon to your quantum-mechanical formula. You cannot derive the current density from the charge density alone.

Yeah, that works perfectly if you do have discrete / localized charges, but it just doesn't seem like it should be necessary.

Also, I think it's a mistake to relegate the probability-current to QM: if my recollection is correct, it originally came from statistical mechanics (see eg the chapters on [classical] ensembles in Dirac's _Principles of QM_).

To go back to the "line charge" -- e.g. ρ(x, t) = 1 (|x=vt| ≤ 10), 0 otherwise, it seems like one could reason out that if the ends are moving, and the "medium" is considered incompressible (and there are no sources/sinks in the region...e.g. The continuity equation holds), then the charge away from the endpoints must be moving as well (e.g. nonzero current), but the way to formalize that into a general statement about the charge density escapes me.

Conversely, if there is a similarly rigorous way to show that it's *not* possible, that would work too (though it would be infinitely more disheartening).
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Current density from charge density?

What is current density?

Current density is a measure of the flow of electric current per unit area. It is represented by the symbol J and is measured in amperes per square meter (A/m²).

How is current density related to charge density?

Current density is directly related to charge density through the equation J = σE, where J is the current density, σ is the charge density, and E is the electric field strength. This means that as the charge density increases, so does the current density.

What is the significance of calculating current density from charge density?

Calculating current density from charge density allows us to understand how electric current is distributed within a material or system. It can also help us determine the behavior of materials under different electric fields and how they may interact with each other.

Can current density vary within a material or system?

Yes, current density can vary within a material or system depending on factors such as the material's conductivity, the strength of the electric field applied, and the presence of any barriers or obstacles that may affect the flow of current.

How is current density measured?

Current density can be measured using specialized instruments such as ammeters or by using mathematical equations that take into account the material's properties and the electric field strength. It is important to note that current density is a vector quantity, meaning it has both magnitude and direction.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
854
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
535
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top