MHB Curvature and torsion on a helix

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the curvature and torsion of a right circular helix parameterized by \(x(t) = R\cos(\omega t)\), \(y(t) = R\sin(\omega t)\), and \(z(t) = v_0t\). The curvature is derived as \(\frac{1}{\rho} = \frac{R\omega^2}{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2}\). The unit tangent vector \(\hat{\mathbf{u}}\) is expressed in terms of the helix parameters, leading to the calculation of the curvature. The discussion also touches on the torsion, represented as \(\tau = -\mathbf{n} \cdot \frac{d \mathbf{b}}{ds}\), where \(\mathbf{t}\), \(\mathbf{n}\), and \(\mathbf{b}\) are defined as the unit tangent, principal normal, and binormal vectors, respectively. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical relationships between these vectors in the context of the helix's geometry.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Consider the case of a right circular helical curve with parameterization \(x(t) = R\cos(\omega t)\), \(y(t) = R\sin(\omega t)\), and \(z(t) = v_0t\). Find the curvature and torsion curve.
http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/7828/gwi.png

We can then parameterize the helix
\begin{align*}
x(t) &= R\cos(\omega t)\\
y(t) &= R\sin(\omega t)\\
z(t) &= v_0t
\end{align*}
We have that
\begin{align*}
\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt} &= v\hat{\mathbf{u}}\\
\hat{\mathbf{u}} &= \frac{1}{v}\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}\\
v\hat{\mathbf{u}} &= \frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}\\
\lvert v\hat{\mathbf{u}}\rvert &= \left\lvert\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}\right\rvert\\
v &= \left\lvert\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}\right\rvert
\end{align*}
From our parameterization, we have that \(\mathbf{r}(t) = R\cos(\omega t)\hat{\mathbf{i}} + R\sin(\omega t)\hat{\mathbf{j}} +
v_0t\hat{\mathbf{k}}\).
Therefore,
\begin{align*}
\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt} &= -R\omega\sin(\omega t)\hat{\mathbf{i}} +
R\omega\cos(\omega t)\hat{\mathbf{j}} + v_0\hat{\mathbf{k}}\\
\left\lvert\frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}\right\rvert
&= \sqrt{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2}\\
v &= \sqrt{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2}
\end{align*}
So our unit vector \(\hat{\mathbf{u}}\) can be written as
\begin{align*}
\hat{\mathbf{u}} &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2}}
\langle -R\omega\sin(\omega t), R\omega\cos(\omega t), v_0\rangle.
\end{align*}
Since \(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} = \frac{1}{\rho}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\),
\(\left\lvert\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} \right\rvert = \frac{1}{\rho}\).
Using the fact that \(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} = \frac{1}{v}\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{dt}\), we can now write
\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{\rho} &= \left\lvert\frac{1}{v}\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{dt}\right\rvert
\end{align*}
Let's take the time derivative of \(\hat{\mathbf{u}}\).
\begin{alignat*}{2}
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{dt} &= \frac{R\omega^2}{\sqrt{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2}}\langle
-\cos(\omega t), -\sin(\omega t), 0\rangle\\
\frac{1}{\rho} &= \frac{R\omega^2}{R^2\omega^2 + v_0^2} &&
\left(\text{curvature}\right)
\end{alignat*}
Now, let's look at \(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds} = -\frac{1}{\tau}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\).
Then \(\left\lvert \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds} \right\rvert = \frac{1}{\tau}\).

I am not sure what I can say about \(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds}\)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, you can write that
$$\tau=-\mathbf{n} \cdot \frac{d \mathbf{b}}{ds},$$
where $\mathbf{b} := \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n}$. So here, I'm using $\mathbf{n}$ as the principal normal vector, $\mathbf{t}$ as the unit tangent vector, and $\mathbf{b}$ as the binormal vector. Can you compute $\mathbf{t}, \mathbf{n},$ and $\mathbf{b}$ in terms of arc length?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top