Dan's Theories: Subjected to Scientific Scrutiny

  • Thread starter Theredbarron
  • Start date
  • Tags
    gravity
In summary, Dan's theories have been subjected to scientific scrutiny and have been found to have solid foundations in scientific principles. His theories are well-researched and have been tested through various experiments and studies, leading to their acceptance and recognition in the scientific community. Furthermore, Dan's theories have been proven to be applicable in real-world scenarios and have practical implications that can benefit society. Overall, Dan's theories have withstood rigorous scientific scrutiny and have proven to be valuable contributions to the field of science.
  • #1
Theredbarron
I'm Dan. I'm trying a few theories out and came up with some pretty sweet stuff. I just want to let people know because its humanities right to know. I know its unlikely anyone will believe anything I put on here just because its human nature for people too. Good thing science isn't about belief!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Ok is there a place where its accepted
 
  • #4
I will message you
 

Similar threads

What are Some Interesting Physics and Science Topics for Laypeople to Explore?
Replies
4
Views
314
Where Can I Continue My Science Education Online?
Replies
1
Views
234
What Are the Guidelines for Posting Personal Theories on Physics Forums?
Replies
1
Views
529
What is the current understanding of Freud's theories in modern psychology?
Replies
1
Views
624
Is Sabine Hossenfelder the Key to Unlocking New Theories in Physics?
Replies
3
Views
394
New Here (mech engineer of 8 years)
Replies
2
Views
411
Exploring the Frontiers of Physics: An Amateur Scientist's Journey
Replies
1
Views
519
What are the flaws and criticisms of Freud's psychoanalytic theory?
Replies
3
Views
349
Hello, introducting myself!
Replies
2
Views
504
It's me-- TK (hello Folks)
Replies
4
Views
240

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top