Data from Normal D is Uncorrelated?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of White Noise in 2D, which is defined as a graph of uncorrelated data and has a covariance matrix of the identity. The example given is drawing data from a standard normal distribution, which results in uncorrelated data due to the normalization of the variance. The conversation also mentions the assumption of uncorrelated variables and the circular scatterplot that is expected from this type of data.
  • #1
WWGD
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,377
11,342
Hi All, I am looking at the page http://www.visiondummy.com/2014/04/geometric-interpretation-covariance-matrix/

In which White Noise in 2D is defined as the/a graph of uncorrelated data, so that the associated co. It is sassociated covariance matrix is the identity. It is stated at one point that one such example is that of data drawn from a standard normal. Can anyone see why this is uncorrelated? Is it because the variance has been normalized to 0, or is there something else?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-8-26_16-57-54.png
    upload_2017-8-26_16-57-54.png
    979 bytes · Views: 432
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I guess you're referring to the statements
Let’s start with unscaled (scale equals 1) and unrotated data. In statistics this is often referred to as ‘white data’ because its samples are drawn from a standard normal distribution and therefore correspond to white (uncorrelated) noise:
[Image]
The covariance matrix of this ‘white’ data equals the identity matrix, such that the variances and standard deviations equal 1 and the covariance equals zero
The data shown in the graph appears to be drawn from a bivariate normal with the identity matrix as covariance matrix, so that it has standard normal marginals and no correlation. The scatterplot is approximately circular, with no apparent trend, as is expected from uncorrelated variates.

I'm afraid I don't fully understand what your question is though.
 
  • #3
Ah, thanks, I had not seen the assumption in the link of the two variables being uncorrelated, so I did not know why the two were said to be uncorrelated.
 

FAQ: Data from Normal D is Uncorrelated?

What does it mean for data from Normal D to be uncorrelated?

Uncorrelated data from Normal D means that there is no relationship or pattern between the data points. This means that the values of one variable do not affect or predict the values of the other variable. In other words, there is no linear association between the two variables.

How can I determine if my data from Normal D is uncorrelated?

You can use statistical tests such as Pearson's correlation coefficient or Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to determine if your data from Normal D is uncorrelated. These tests measure the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. A value close to 0 indicates no correlation, while a value close to 1 or -1 indicates a strong positive or negative correlation, respectively.

What are the advantages of having uncorrelated data from Normal D?

Having uncorrelated data from Normal D allows for easier interpretation and analysis. It reduces the risk of making incorrect conclusions or predictions based on misleading relationships between variables. It also simplifies statistical modeling and can improve the accuracy of statistical tests.

Can data from Normal D be both uncorrelated and dependent?

Yes, data from Normal D can be uncorrelated but still dependent. This means that there is no linear relationship between the variables, but they may still have a nonlinear relationship or be influenced by other underlying factors. It is important to thoroughly analyze the data and consider other factors before concluding that the data is truly uncorrelated.

How does uncorrelated data from Normal D impact statistical analysis?

Uncorrelated data from Normal D can simplify statistical analysis and make it more accurate. It allows for the use of simpler statistical models and reduces the risk of making incorrect conclusions. However, it is important to note that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, so further analysis and consideration of other factors is still necessary in drawing conclusions from the data.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
968
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top