Database of theories beyond the standard model?

In summary, a speaker at the Great Debate on Parallel Realities and the Fundamentals of Physics discussed how there are currently 7,000 theories beyond the standard model that fit available data. This number refers to the number of papers written on the topic and there is no central database for these theories. Some theories have been ruled out by experiments at the Large Hadron Collider. Physicists keep track of theories by following arxiv.org and there are some categories of theories, but the problem of organizing and keeping track of these theories is complex and there is no central database for all of them.
  • #1
vulcantaylor
4
0
I am a programmer and physics fan. A speaker (Lawrence Krauss?) at https://origins.asu.edu/events/great-debate-parallel-realities-probing-fundamental-physics (not on youtube yet) said physics theories beyond the standard model are an under-determined problem. There are 7,000 theories that fit the available data. Is that just an estimated number or is there a database with all the theories? A web article said some theories have been ruled out by not finding unexpected particles yet at the Large Hadron Collider. Does the database of theories list queryable things like particle energy ranges, proton decay rate, etc. (for theories that can make predictions)?

I found some links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Gravity
http://wwwth.mpp.mpg.de/members/strings/strings2012/strings_files/program/Talks/Thursday/Nicolai.pdf
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9803024
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/SupersymmetryPublicResults

Does every physics group only keep private notes on the theories they find most promising?
Is there a way to tell a paper on arxiv.org has been obsoleted by experiment? Is there a way of avoiding a physics theory from being forgotten for a long time before making a comeback?
Or is the problem too hard and the database is the whole internet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No central database of Beyond Standard Model theories

The speaker Brian Schmidt said there were 7000 theories for why the universe expansion is accelerating. That number refers to the number of papers which have been written that cite the Dark Energy discovery paper:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ...116.1009R
The list of followup papers is here:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/n.....116.1009R&refs=CITATIONS&db_key=AST

There is no central database of Beyond Standard Model theories. Physicists keep up with theories by following arxiv.org

The slides "The Zoo of BSM physics at the LHC" show some categories of theories
http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/ssi/2012/Presentations/Rizzo-1.pdf
 

Attachments

  • SUSYexcluded.jpg
    SUSYexcluded.jpg
    56 KB · Views: 568

FAQ: Database of theories beyond the standard model?

What is the purpose of a database of theories beyond the standard model?

A database of theories beyond the standard model serves as a repository for all the proposed theories and models that aim to explain phenomena that cannot be explained by the current standard model of particle physics. It allows scientists to access and analyze a wide range of theories and compare them to experimental data, ultimately aiding in the search for a more comprehensive understanding of the universe.

Who contributes to this database?

Scientists from various fields such as particle physics, cosmology, and quantum mechanics contribute to this database by submitting their theories and models for consideration. The database is continuously updated as new theories and models are proposed and tested.

How is the data in the database verified?

The data in the database is verified through rigorous peer-review processes and experimental data. Scientists review and analyze the theories and models to ensure they are mathematically and logically sound. Additionally, experimental data is used to test the predictions of the theories and models, providing further validation.

Is there a consensus on which theory is the most promising?

No, there is currently no consensus on which theory is the most promising. The search for a theory beyond the standard model is ongoing, and multiple theories and models are being explored and tested. It is possible that a combination of theories may be needed to fully explain the phenomena that the standard model cannot.

How can this database benefit scientific research?

This database can benefit scientific research by providing a comprehensive collection of theories and models for scientists to access and analyze. It allows for a more efficient exploration of potential theories and can aid in identifying new avenues for research. It also promotes collaboration and exchange of ideas among scientists, ultimately driving progress in the field.

Similar threads

B Question regarding 'beauty' in the theories that go beyond the standard model
Replies
2
Views
1K
A Strand Model Published: Physics of Particles & Nuclei 50 (2019)
2
Replies
41
Views
9K
I What are the Priority Tasks for High Energy Physics Beyond the Standard Model?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Neutrino miminal standard model vs string/M-theory
Replies
12
Views
2K
CC Problem Beyond the Standard Model
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Does the New Muon g-2 Measurement Indicate Physics Beyond the Standard Model?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Beyond the noncommutative standard model
Replies
14
Views
5K
What is the current status of particle physics beyond the standard model?
Replies
1
Views
3K
B Preon quark models excluded by LHC
Replies
7
Views
3K
Status of lattice standard model
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top