DC input random offset voltage for diff. amplifier with current-mirror load

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the derivation of equation 6.69 in "Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits" by Gray and Meyer, specifically regarding the input offset voltage (VOS) for a differential amplifier with a current-mirror load. The user expresses confusion over the absence of supply voltages VSS and VDD in the equation and questions whether the definitions provided in the book align with this derivation. It is noted that the supply voltages can be considered equal and opposite, which contributes to the circuit's symmetrical nature and independence from the differential input pair. Ultimately, the user discovers that the relevant derivation can actually be found on pages 332-333 of the same book. This highlights the importance of thorough reference checking in complex circuit analysis.
eyeweyew
Messages
35
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
how the expression for DC input offset voltage for diff. amplifier with current mirror load come about
I am trying to figure out how the derivation of equation 6.69 come about on page 426 in the book Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits, 5th Edition by Gray and Meyer. They defined on page 424 under section 6.3.3 the input offset voltage (VOS) of op amps with differential inputs and single-ended outputs as the differential input voltage for which the dc output voltage is midway between the supplies. But I don’t see VSS and VDD in the equation so I am not sure if they are using this definition since they did mention another definition for VOS under 6.3.3 which is the differential input voltage for which the op-amp output voltage is zero but I try to follow the similar derivation on pg. 234-236 under 3.5.6.6 and 3.5.6.7 for diff. amp with resistors pair as loads but I still don’t get how do they come about equation 6.69?Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits, 5th Edition
http://fa.ee.sut.ac.ir/Downloads/AcademicStaff/24/Courses/73/[Gray___Meyer]_Analysis_and_Design_of_Analog_Integrated_Circuits_5th_ed.pdf
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
eyeweyew said:
But I don’t see VSS and VDD in the equation so I am not sure if they are using this definition ...
The supply voltages can be assumed typical, equal and opposite, and sufficient for the circuit to operate.

Supply voltage is independent, since the circuit is symmetrical. The supplies are isolated from the differential input pair, by the collector or drain voltage of the other transistors employed.

Part of the elegance of employing a current mirror as the load, is supply voltage independence, while the gain of the differential input pair is effectively squared.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and dlgoff
eyeweyew said:
TL;DR Summary: how the expression for DC input offset voltage for diff. amplifier with current mirror load come about

I am trying to figure out how the derivation of equation 6.69 come about on page 426 in the book Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits, 5th Edition by Gray and Meyer. They defined on page 424 under section 6.3.3 the input offset voltage (VOS) of op amps with differential inputs and single-ended outputs as the differential input voltage for which the dc output voltage is midway between the supplies. But I don’t see VSS and VDD in the equation so I am not sure if they are using this definition since they did mention another definition for VOS under 6.3.3 which is the differential input voltage for which the op-amp output voltage is zero but I try to follow the similar derivation on pg. 234-236 under 3.5.6.6 and 3.5.6.7 for diff. amp with resistors pair as loads but I still don’t get how do they come about equation 6.69?Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits, 5th Edition
http://fa.ee.sut.ac.ir/Downloads/AcademicStaff/24/Courses/73/[Gray___Meyer]_Analysis_and_Design_of_Analog_Integrated_Circuits_5th_ed.pdf
Ok, Never mind. The derivation is actually on page 332-333 in the same book.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top