Decisions in Managerial Economics

  • MHB
  • Thread starter prettylily
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Economics
In summary: This means that he values gains and losses differently and has a diminishing marginal utility for gains and losses. Using the Treplan software, we can calculate the expected utility for each decision.For bidding £5 million, the expected utility is:(0.3 * ln(£7.5 million - £5 million)) + (0.7 * ln(-£500,000)) = 0.693 + -0.356 = 0.337For not bidding, the expected utility is 0.Based on this analysis, it seems like not bidding is the better option for Jeremiah, as it has a higher expected utility. However, we also need to consider the potential profit from bidding and
  • #1
prettylily
1
0
Hi, I just started Managerial Economics and I'm starting to wonder why I chose it! Weve gone through a lot of important topics but we got the following question for practice and I can't make head or tail of it, my brain is completely blank and I started drawing the tree. I would really appreciate it if someone could direct me on how to approach this. Thanks!

The past few years have seen a general decline in the economic conditions of the Royal Borough of Kingstown, the recent financial crisis has made this decline even more acute. Certain town officials, as well as other interested parties from Kingstown, believe that the legalisation of casino gambling will greatly improve the City's future. They have succeeded in having a gambling referendum placed on the ballot in next month's council voting.

One effect of the declining economic conditions of Kingstown has been the bankruptcy of the city's largest hotel the Kingstown Carlton. The Carlton is scheduled to be sold at a sealed bid auction next week. The terms of the auction call for an immediate 10% down payment by the highest bidder, with the remaining balance due in two months.

One party interested in bidding for the Carlton is Jeremiah Samouel, a real estate promoter and publisher of Fantasy Magazine. Jeremiah has learned from associates that there are at least three other parties interested in the property, including a syndicate from Chelmsford.

Jeremiah has decided that if he submits a bid it will be £5 million for the property. If he bids £5 million, he estimates he has a 35% chance of winning the auction. He also estimates that if the gambling vote is successful, he can sell the property for £7.5 million. If the initiative fails, he will sacrifice his 10% deposit.

Jeremiah believes, based upon polls taken to date, that the gambling vote has a 30% chance of passing. To help in his decision he is considering hiring the noted pollster, Russell Gallup, before the auction to give his opinion. Based upon Gallup's past record, Jeremiah estimates that the probability Gallup will correctly predict the outcome is 85%. Gallup's fee is £50,000.

The new project’s research department at Samouel's has been given the task of evaluating Jeremiah's best course of action. Specifically you and two colleagues in the department have control of the evaluation. It was initially your belief that Jeremiah is an expected monetary value optimiser, however recent discussions have led to some doubt about this. Particularly as Jeremiah recently indicated that he was indifferent between participation in a venture which exhibited a 50:50 chance of a payoff of -£50,000 or £225,000, and a riskless venture returning £50,000. Moreover when pressed Jeremiah had admitted that he would have bid no more than £45,000 to participate in the risky venture. This information suggests to you that an exponential utility function might capture Jeremiah's preferences.

Carry out an analysis from the standpoint of both EMV and expected utility to establish Jerimiah’s best course of action, including a consideration of his bidding strategy with regard to the auction. You should also address how his attitude to risk might be assessed. Jeremiah is aware of its existence. He therefore expects to see part of the analysis carried out using this. In particular any decision trees produced should include analysis using the exponential utility function built into Treplan. There should also be a statement of the mechanism by which Jeremiah’s Utility function might be estimated.

Produce a clear and precise solution for Jeremiah, including a full sensitivity analysis of you results, given the subjective nature of the probabilities supplied.


Note:


  1. Jeremiah’s choice must include consideration of using the pollster. Thus if that route is chosen then likelihoods must be conditioned on making this choice. This will require appropriate posterior probabilities in the decision tree.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hello there,

As a scientist in the field of economics, I understand your frustration with the complex question you have been presented with. Let me break down the key elements and provide you with a step-by-step approach to solving this problem.

Firstly, it is important to understand the context of the situation. The Royal Borough of Kingstown is facing economic decline and there is a proposal to legalize casino gambling in order to improve the city's future. This has led to the bankruptcy of the city's largest hotel, the Kingstown Carlton, which is now up for auction.

Jeremiah Samouel, a real estate promoter and publisher, is interested in bidding for the Carlton. He has estimated a 35% chance of winning the auction if he bids £5 million. However, there is also a 30% chance that the gambling vote will fail, in which case he will lose his 10% deposit. To help with his decision, he is considering hiring a pollster, Russell Gallup, for £50,000. Gallup has an 85% chance of correctly predicting the outcome of the gambling vote.

To begin with, we need to establish Jeremiah's best course of action using both the Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and Expected Utility methods. EMV is based on the principle of maximizing expected profits, while Expected Utility takes into account the decision maker's attitude towards risk.

For the EMV approach, we need to calculate the expected payoff for each possible outcome. If the gambling vote passes, Jeremiah can sell the property for £7.5 million, resulting in a profit of £2.5 million (£7.5 million - £5 million = £2.5 million). However, if the vote fails, he will lose his 10% deposit of £500,000. Therefore, the expected payoff for bidding £5 million is:

(0.3 * £2.5 million) + (0.7 * -£500,000) = £750,000 - £350,000 = £400,000

On the other hand, if Jeremiah decides not to bid, he will not incur any costs or make any profits. Therefore, the expected payoff for not bidding is 0.

Based on this analysis, it seems like bidding £5 million is the better option for Jeremiah, as it has a higher expected payoff. However, we also need to consider his attitude towards risk.

As mentioned in the forum post, Jeremiah's preferences seem to be
 

FAQ: Decisions in Managerial Economics

What is the role of managerial economics in decision making?

Managerial economics is the application of economic theories and principles to aid in decision making by managers. It helps managers to understand and analyze the economic environment in which their organization operates, and make rational decisions that will maximize their company's profits and achieve its goals.

How does managerial economics differ from traditional economics?

Traditional economics focuses on the theoretical study of how markets work and how individuals and businesses make decisions. Managerial economics, on the other hand, is more practical and applied. It deals with the specific decision-making processes and strategies used by managers to achieve the organization's objectives.

What are the key elements of decision making in managerial economics?

The key elements of decision making in managerial economics include identifying the problem or opportunity, gathering relevant data and information, analyzing and evaluating the alternatives, and choosing the best course of action based on cost-benefit analysis. It also involves considering factors such as market demand, competition, and external economic conditions.

How does uncertainty and risk affect decision making in managerial economics?

Uncertainty and risk are inherent in any decision-making process in managerial economics. Managers must consider the potential risks and uncertainties associated with each decision and weigh them against the potential rewards. They may use tools like decision trees or sensitivity analysis to evaluate the potential outcomes and make informed decisions.

What are the limitations of using economic principles in managerial decision making?

While economic principles can provide valuable insights and guidance for managerial decision making, they do have limitations. Economic models may not always accurately reflect real-world situations, and managers must also consider other factors such as ethical considerations, social responsibility, and organizational culture when making decisions. Additionally, economic theories may not be applicable in every situation, and managers must use their judgment and experience to make the best decisions for their organization.

Similar threads

Back
Top