- #1
6.28318531
- 54
- 0
This wasn't originally a homework problem as such, so sorry if its confusing, but I thought I would ask it here;
Show that the the two methods of creating the n-torus are equivalent.
1) The n-torus as the quotient space obtained from ℝn by the relation x~y iff x-y [itex]\in[/itex] Zn.
2) The n-torus given by the product of n circles Tn= S1×S1×...×S1.
S1 is the collection of equivalence classes [x]={y:y~x}.
An equivalence relation x~y iff x-y [itex]\in[/itex] Z
Well, I suppose we want an inductive proof? In our second definition, when n=1, we just have S1. This is clearly the same as the definition for S1. So then we want to then look at n = k and n = k + 1...What's the best way to go about this?
( Note Z means the set of integers)
Thanks,
Homework Statement
Show that the the two methods of creating the n-torus are equivalent.
1) The n-torus as the quotient space obtained from ℝn by the relation x~y iff x-y [itex]\in[/itex] Zn.
2) The n-torus given by the product of n circles Tn= S1×S1×...×S1.
Homework Equations
S1 is the collection of equivalence classes [x]={y:y~x}.
An equivalence relation x~y iff x-y [itex]\in[/itex] Z
The Attempt at a Solution
Well, I suppose we want an inductive proof? In our second definition, when n=1, we just have S1. This is clearly the same as the definition for S1. So then we want to then look at n = k and n = k + 1...What's the best way to go about this?
( Note Z means the set of integers)
Thanks,