- #1
Elm8429
- 2
- 2
- TL;DR Summary
- Studying delta sequences and am wondering if ##\phi_n(x)## is a delta sequence, does it extends that property to all of it's arguments ?
Studying delta sequences and am wondering if ##\phi_n(x)## is a delta sequence (it resembles and validates the sifting property), will ##\phi_n(x - a)## or ##\phi_n(whatever)## respect the sifting property ? I think I get confused in the semantics, because reading my textbook, I get the following where I test if ##\phi_n(x)## is a delta sequence if it has the expected sifting property of the delta function, but then we use ##\phi_n(x)## to test all the other sifting properties of the delta function for different arguments ! : we confirmed that ##\phi_n(x)## is a delta sequence, so ##\phi_n(whatever)## can express the delta function of ##\delta(whatever)## the get "whatever" shifting property.
I hope my confusion was clear and that someone will remedy my theoretical woes !
I hope my confusion was clear and that someone will remedy my theoretical woes !