MHB DeMoivre's Theorem express (sqrt(2)/2 + sqrt(2)/2 i)^8 in a+bi form

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elissa89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing (sqrt(2)/2 + sqrt(2)/2 i)^8 in a+bi form using DeMoivre's Theorem. The user calculates the expression and arrives at 1*i, but WebAssign indicates this is incorrect. A participant points out that the sine of 2π is actually 0, leading to the correct evaluation of cos(2π) + i*sin(2π) as 1. The user is misapplying the sine and cosine values, which results in the confusion over the final answer. The correct result should be simply 1, not 1*i.
Elissa89
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
So the question is:

express (sqrt(2)/2 + sqrt(2)/2 i)^8 in a+bi form

I know r=1 and tangent=pi/4

Using the theorem i get 1(cos (2pi) +i*sin (2pi)) which becomes 1(1*i)=1*i however WebAssign says this is incorrect. I've also tried "0+1i" and just "i"

What am I doing wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Elissa89 said:
So the question is:

express (sqrt(2)/2 + sqrt(2)/2 i)^8 in a+bi form

I know r=1 and tangent=pi/4

Using the theorem i get 1(cos (2pi) +i*sin (2pi)) which becomes 1(1*i)=1*i however WebAssign says this is incorrect. I've also tried "0+1i" and just "i"

What am I doing wrong?

Isn't $\sin(2\pi)$ equal to $0$ instead of $1$?
 
You are evaluating sine and cosine incorrectly!

$cos(2\pi)+ i sin(2\pi)= 1+ i(0)= 1$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top