- #1
diogenesNY
- 229
- 244
Dennis Overbye, New York Times columnist and its “cosmic affairs correspondent” is retiring after 25 years.
He contributed regular columns for The New York Times and maintained an unusually and impressively factual density to otherwise highly readable science journalism.
Occasionally his articles seemed slightly incomplete or missing a critical detail or two in order for the article to make sense as a whole. These instances, however, were usually the result of some overzealous editor who would clip out some critical word or datum leaving the article less than clear. I was always able to get some assistance and clarity from my PF friends who would help fill in the gaps of an otherwise well constructed article.
Dennis Overbye's current and final New York Times column.: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/20/...6242&user_id=3ffbe6c78eb3f50a57e1995fc26ec5a3
He contributed regular columns for The New York Times and maintained an unusually and impressively factual density to otherwise highly readable science journalism.
Occasionally his articles seemed slightly incomplete or missing a critical detail or two in order for the article to make sense as a whole. These instances, however, were usually the result of some overzealous editor who would clip out some critical word or datum leaving the article less than clear. I was always able to get some assistance and clarity from my PF friends who would help fill in the gaps of an otherwise well constructed article.
Dennis Overbye's current and final New York Times column.: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/20/...6242&user_id=3ffbe6c78eb3f50a57e1995fc26ec5a3