Derek parfit view on personal identity

  • Thread starter billa12
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Identity
In summary, Derek Parfit's view on personal identity is that there is no persisting self, and our sense of self is made up of changing psychological states and experiences. This differs from traditional views that believe in an enduring self or soul. Parfit's main argument is based on the thought experiment of the "Teletransporter," which challenges the traditional view of personal identity. Some potential criticisms of his view include undermining personal relationships and moral responsibility, as well as being too reductionist. This view also impacts our understanding of death, as Parfit suggests that there is no persisting self to continue on after death.
  • #1
billa12
22
0
I am trying to understand Derek Parfit view on persistence of personal identity. You don’t have to take in weird examples such as branching. Can you also show some of the flaws of his view. Can you advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are two ways to view identity:

As it is. Our "identity" is constantly changing. Our cells constantly die and regrow. Atoms constantly move in and out of us. But we still appear the same.

As we regard it. That's purely subjective.
 

Related to Derek parfit view on personal identity

What is Derek Parfit's view on personal identity?

Derek Parfit's view on personal identity is the idea that there is no such thing as a persisting self. He argues that our sense of self is a collection of ever-changing psychological states and experiences, rather than a distinct entity that remains the same over time.

How does Parfit's view on personal identity differ from traditional views?

Parfit's view differs from traditional views in that it rejects the notion of an enduring self or soul. Instead, he proposes that personal identity is a matter of psychological connectedness and continuity.

What is the main argument for Parfit's view on personal identity?

The main argument for Parfit's view is the thought experiment of the "Teletransporter." This hypothetical scenario involves a person being scanned and their information being transmitted to a different location to be reconstructed. Parfit argues that the reconstructed person would not be the same person as the original, thus challenging the traditional view of personal identity.

What are some potential criticisms of Parfit's view on personal identity?

Some critics argue that Parfit's view undermines the significance of personal relationships and the concept of moral responsibility. Others argue that his view is too reductionist and does not fully capture the complexity of personal identity.

How does Parfit's view on personal identity impact our understanding of death?

Parfit's view suggests that death is not the end of personal identity, as our sense of self is constantly changing and evolving. This challenges traditional beliefs about an afterlife or reincarnation, as there is no persisting self to continue on after death.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
917
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
760
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
773
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
Back
Top