MHB Derivation Application in Differential Calculus, verification question problem.

jamescv31
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Greetings everyone in MHB. :)

Well I've just created a thread to just verify if my answer is correct. On a simple problem that using implicit differentiation.

A cylindrical tank of radius 10 ft is having drained with water at the rate of 200 f^3/ min. How fast is the height of water changed?

Find dh/ dt

My solution goes here:

The formula used is V= (\pi) (r^2) (h)

then substitute the values

200 ft^3/min =pi (100ft) (dh/dt)

therefore my answer is 1/2 pi ft^3/min

Can anyone check this if its a right solution made?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you correctly surmised, we have:

$$\d{V}{t}=\pi r^2\d{h}{t}$$

The cylindrical tank is being drained, so it's volume is decreasing! $-200 \frac{f^3}{min}$, you have to remember the negative.

Plugging what we know:

$$-200=100\pi \d{h}{t}$$

How can we isolate for $\d{h}{t}$?
 
Rido12 said:
As you correctly surmised, we have:

$$\d{V}{t}=\pi r^2\d{h}{t}$$

The cylindrical tank is being drained, so it's volume is decreasing! $-200 \frac{f^3}{min}$, you have to remember the negative.

Plugging what we know:

$$-200=100\pi \d{h}{t}$$

How can we isolate for $\d{h}{t}$?

by using implicit difference where the -200ft/min is the numerator and the 100 ft is th denominator hence the answer is -1/2 pi ft ^ 3min.
 
Last edited:
jamescv31 said:
by using implicit difference where the -200ft/min is the numerator and the 100 ft is th denominator hence the answer is -1/2 pi ft ^ 3min.

$$\frac{-200}{100\pi}=\text{what again?}.$$

Also check your units. The $100\pi$ isn't just $100\pi$. It has some units attached to it, which means your final answer might have different units. What units would make sense?
 
its -2 pi ft^3min a typo error. But the implicit difference where the placing of values for numerator and denominator is correct right?
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top