Derivation of Heat Equation for frustum-shaped rod

In summary, the heat equation for a rod in the shape of a frustum can be derived using the "exact" method, assuming constant specific heat and density and no heat source. The cross-section area of the rod is not constant, leading to the use of an integral. After several steps, the equation can be simplified to \frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t} \int_{a}^{b} e(x,t)A(x)dx = \Phi(a,t)A(a) - \Phi(b,t)A(b) = -\int_{a}^{b}\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} x}(\Phi(x,t)A(x))dx =
  • #1
telercoi
1
0

Homework Statement



Derive the Heat Equation for a rod in the shape of a frustum. Assume the specific heat c and density p are all constant. Use the "exact" method (through an integral) to derive the heat equation. Also, there is no heat source in the rod.

Homework Equations



The cross-section area for this rod is not constant, thus A=A(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t} \int_{a}^{b} e(x,t)A(x)dx

= \Phi(a,t)A(a) - \Phi(b,t)A(b)

=-\int_{a}^{b}\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} x}(\Phi(x,t)A(x))dx

=-\int_{a}^{b}\frac{\mathrm{d} \Phi(x,t)A(x))}{\mathrm{d} x} + \Phi(x,t)A'(x)dx

And this is as far as I've gotten. I think the last step may be incorrect as well; it's quite different from anything we've done in class. Can anyone help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
telercoi said:

Homework Statement



Derive the Heat Equation for a rod in the shape of a frustum. Assume the specific heat c and density p are all constant. Use the "exact" method (through an integral) to derive the heat equation. Also, there is no heat source in the rod.

Homework Equations



The cross-section area for this rod is not constant, thus A=A(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t} \int_{a}^{b} e(x,t)A(x)dx

= \Phi(a,t)A(a) - \Phi(b,t)A(b)

=-\int_{a}^{b}\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} x}(\Phi(x,t)A(x))dx

=-\int_{a}^{b}\frac{\mathrm{d} \Phi(x,t)A(x))}{\mathrm{d} x} + \Phi(x,t)A'(x)dx

And this is as far as I've gotten. I think the last step may be incorrect as well; it's quite different from anything we've done in class. Can anyone help please?

[tex]\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t} \int_{a}^{b} e(x,t)A(x)dx

= \Phi(a,t)A(a) - \Phi(b,t)A(b)

=-\int_{a}^{b}\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} x}(\Phi(x,t)A(x))dx

=-\int_{a}^{b}\frac{\mathrm{d} \Phi(x,t)A(x))}{\mathrm{d} x} + \Phi(x,t)A'(x)dx[/tex]

Put tex tags around your equation.:smile:
 

FAQ: Derivation of Heat Equation for frustum-shaped rod

What is the heat equation for a frustum-shaped rod?

The heat equation for a frustum-shaped rod is a partial differential equation that describes the distribution of heat in a rod with a tapered shape. It takes into account the variation in cross-sectional area along the length of the rod.

How is the heat equation derived for a frustum-shaped rod?

The heat equation for a frustum-shaped rod can be derived using the principles of heat transfer and Fourier's law. This involves considering the heat flow through different cross-sectional areas of the rod and applying the conservation of energy equation.

What are the assumptions made in deriving the heat equation for a frustum-shaped rod?

The main assumptions made in deriving the heat equation for a frustum-shaped rod include: 1) the rod is made of a homogeneous material, 2) the heat transfer is one-dimensional, 3) there is no internal heat generation, and 4) the thermal conductivity is constant.

What are the applications of the heat equation for a frustum-shaped rod?

The heat equation for a frustum-shaped rod has many practical applications, such as in the design and analysis of heat exchangers, thermocouples, and other heat transfer devices. It can also be used to study the thermal behavior of rods with non-uniform cross-sectional shapes.

Are there any limitations to the heat equation for a frustum-shaped rod?

Like any mathematical model, the heat equation for a frustum-shaped rod has its limitations. It assumes certain simplifications and idealizations, such as constant thermal properties and one-dimensional heat transfer. Additionally, it may not accurately predict the behavior of rods with complex shapes or when there are significant variations in temperature or heat flux.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top