A Derivation of recovery channel for bit flip error

steve1763
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I have found a derivation of the recovery channel for a bit flip error (using the derivation of the Knill-Laflamme condition), but dont quite understand it.
In general, if R is the recovery channel of an error channel ε, with state ρ, then
Screenshot 2021-07-27 at 15.18.43.png

and according to these lecture slides, we get the final result highlighted in red for a bit flip error channel. I am simply asking how one reaches this final result. Thank you (a full-ish derivation can be found at https://orion.math.iastate.edu/ytpoon/publication/qecc1.pdf on pages 6-7, but for some reason i still don't understand how one gets to the final answer).

Screenshot 2021-07-27 at 15.20.15.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To get the final result, we start by applying the definition of recovery channel:\begin{align}R(\rho) &= \sum_i A_i \rho A_i^\dagger \\&= \sum_i A_i \rho A_i^\dagger \sum_j B_j \rho B_j^\dagger \\&= \sum_{i,j} A_i \rho A_i^\dagger B_j \rho B_j^\dagger\end{align}Now, for a bit flip error channel, we have $A_i = \sigma_x^i$ and $B_j = \sigma_x^j$. Substituting these values into the equation above gives us\begin{align}R(\rho) &= \sum_{i,j} \sigma_x^i \rho \sigma_x^{i\dagger} \sigma_x^j \rho \sigma_x^{j\dagger} \\&= \sum_{i,j} \sigma_x^i \rho \sigma_x^i \sigma_x^j \rho \sigma_x^j \\&= \sum_{i,j} \sigma_x^{i+j} \rho \sigma_x^{i+j} \\&= \sum_k \sigma_x^k \rho \sigma_x^k\end{align}where $k = i + j$. This is the final result.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top