Derivation of the density of states?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the density of states from the Schrödinger equation in a 3D potential box. The user initially calculates the total number of quantum states and attempts to express the density of states, but encounters discrepancies with standard textbook results. Clarifications are provided regarding the need to differentiate the number of states in a shell and the importance of expressing variables correctly in terms of energy. The conversation highlights the role of degeneracy in the density of states and the rationale behind its definition, emphasizing the need for precision in calculations. Ultimately, the user gains clarity on the correct approach to deriving the density of states.
patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
i have a question concerning the derivation of the density of states
Relevant Equations
g(E) =sqrt(2)/pi^2*(m/hbar^2)^(3/2)*sqrt(E)
hi guys
i have a question about the derivation of the density of states , after solving the Schrodinger equation in the 3d potential box and using the boundary conditions ... etc we came to the conclusion that the quantum state occupy a volume of ##\frac{\pi^{3}}{V_{T}}## in k space
and to count the total number of quantum states its easier to count them in a shell with thickness dk then integrate , so we have :
$$N_{shell} =\frac{\frac{1}{8}4\pi*k^{2}dk}{\frac{\pi^{3}}{V_{T}}}$$
then integrating to get the total number of states give us :
$$N_{T} =\frac{V_{T}}{(2\pi^{2})}\frac{1}{3}k^{3}$$
and translating that expression in terms of the energy
$$N_{T} =\frac{V}{3}(\frac{\sqrt(2)}{\pi^{2}})(\frac{m}{\hbar^{2}})^{3/2}E^{3/2}$$
now dividing by V and E to get the number of quantum states per unit volume and energy give us :
$$g(E) =\frac{1}{3}(\frac{\sqrt(2)}{\pi^{}2})(\frac{m}{\hbar^{2}})^{3/2}E^{1/2}$$
but that expression doesn't look similer to the standerd one in textbooks
$$g(E) =(\frac{\sqrt(2)}{\pi^{}2})(\frac{m}{\hbar^{2}})^{3/2}E^{1/2}$$
what i am doing wrong here ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't ##g(E)## rather what you called ##N_{\text{shell}}## expressed in terms of ##E=\hbar^2 k^2/(2m)##? Note that you also have to express also ##\mathrm{d} k## in terms of ##\mathrm{d} E##. With this you get the textbook result, i.e.,
$$g(E)=\frac{\sqrt{m^3 E}}{\sqrt{2} \hbar^3 \pi^2}.$$
 
vanhees71 said:
Isn't ##g(E)## rather what you called ##N_{\text{shell}}## expressed in terms of ##E=\hbar^2 k^2/(2m)##? Note that you also have to express also ##\mathrm{d} k## in terms of ##\mathrm{d} E##. With this you get the textbook result, i.e.,
$$g(E)=\frac{\sqrt{m^3 E}}{\sqrt{2} \hbar^3 \pi^2}.$$
i am a little bit confused here , isn't ##N_{\text{shell}}## is just the number of quantum states in the shell dk and the density of states is defined as the number of quantum sates per unit volume per unit energy , so i cannot just say that ##\frac{N_{\text{shell}}}{V}## is ##g(E) ## since i need to get the total states by integration then divide by ##V## then divide by ##E## ? , replacing k and dk in ##N_{\text{shell}}## expression gives me :
$$ \frac{V}{2}*\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\pi^{2}}*(\frac{m}{\hbar^2})^{3/2}\sqrt{E}dE $$
which is not slimier to the expression i need :
$$g(E) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\pi^{2}}*(\frac{m}{\hbar^2})^{3/2}\sqrt{E}$$
am i misinterpreting something here ?
 
What's meant is by definition
$$g(E)=\frac{1}{V_T} \frac{\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}}{\mathrm{d}E}=\frac{1}{V_T} \frac{\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}}{\mathrm{d}k} \frac{\mathrm{d} k}{\mathrm{d} E}.$$
Your ##N_{\text{shell}}## should be rather ##\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}##.

Your additional factor 2 may be from a degeneracy of states, e.g., if you refer to the em. field in a cavity where for (almost all) ##\vec{k}## you have ##g=2## distinct polarization states.
 
  • Informative
Likes patric44
vanhees71 said:
What's meant is by definition
$$g(E)=\frac{1}{V_T} \frac{\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}}{\mathrm{d}E}=\frac{1}{V_T} \frac{\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}}{\mathrm{d}k} \frac{\mathrm{d} k}{\mathrm{d} E}.$$
Your ##N_{\text{shell}}## should be rather ##\mathrm{d} N_{\text{shell}}##.

Your additional factor 2 may be from a degeneracy of states, e.g., if you refer to the em. field in a cavity where for (almost all) ##\vec{k}## you have ##g=2## distinct polarization states.
oh i think i got it now , so the density of states is just the number of energy states per unit volume confined to that specific dk shell , and the extra degeneracy will cancel the extra ##\frac{1}{2}## that i don't want , isn't that right ?
i am sorry but why is it defined that way ? its a bit confusing , isn't it just more intuitive to define the density of states as the total states in the 1/8 sphere per unit volume per unit energy ?!
 
That would give you the average density whereas you want the density for a given ##E##.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71 and patric44
Back
Top