- #1
AndersF
- 27
- 4
- TL;DR Summary
- If the covariant form for the Levi-Civita is defined as ##\varepsilon_{i,j,k}:=\sqrt{g}\epsilon_{i,j,k}##, how could be shown from this definition that it's contravariant form is given by ##\varepsilon^{i,j,k}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{g}}\epsilon^{i,j,k}##?
The covariant form for the Levi-Civita is defined as ##\varepsilon_{i,j,k}:=\sqrt{g}\epsilon_{i,j,k}##. I want to show from this definition that it's contravariant form is given by ##\varepsilon^{i,j,k}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{g}}\epsilon^{i,j,k}##.My attemptWhat I have tried is to express this tensor ##\varepsilon^{i j k}## through the contraction with the metric tensor of ##\varepsilon_{i j k}## the contravariant form, and then to replace the definition of ##\varepsilon_{i j k}##:##\varepsilon^{i j k}=g^{i p} g^{j q} g^{k r} \varepsilon_{p q r}=g^{i p} g^{j q} g^{k r} \sqrt{g} \epsilon_{p q r}##
This expression reminds me of the the expression of the determinant of the dual metric tensor, ##g^{-1}=\det (g^{ij})##, through the Levi-Civita symbol:
##g^{-1}=g^{1 p} g^{2 q} g^{3 r} \epsilon_{p q r}##
But I'm stuck here, as I don't know how to match these expressions... Would there be any way to achieve this? Would this be a good way to prove the theorem?
This expression reminds me of the the expression of the determinant of the dual metric tensor, ##g^{-1}=\det (g^{ij})##, through the Levi-Civita symbol:
##g^{-1}=g^{1 p} g^{2 q} g^{3 r} \epsilon_{p q r}##
But I'm stuck here, as I don't know how to match these expressions... Would there be any way to achieve this? Would this be a good way to prove the theorem?