Describing the relationship between two sets A and B (probability)

In summary: So, in summary, the relationship between sets A and B depends on the given conditions:a. If $Pr(A|B)=Pr(A)$, then A and B are independent events.b. If $Pr(A/B)=0$, then A and B are mutually exclusive.c. If $Pr(A/B)=Pr(A)/Pr(B)$, then $P(A\setminus B)=0$, meaning the probability of A occurring without B occurring is 0. This does not necessarily mean that A is a subset of B.
  • #1
Byeongok
13
0
Hi I am new here!
hopefully someone is kind enough to reply fast and help.

so the question I am stuck is:

Describe the relationship between two sets A and B ( A and B are non-empty) if:
a. Pr(A|B)=Pr(A)
b. Pr(A/B)=0
c. Pr(A/B)=Pr(A)/Pr(B)

(Sorry guys can't get the fraction signs working! so / means fraction or divide)

Usually i'd add some working that i did, but i just can't understand the question it self and the notations used.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Year10Student said:
Hi I am new here!
hopefully someone is kind enough to reply fast and help.

so the question I am stuck is:

Describe the relationship between two sets A and B ( A and B are non-empty) if:
a. Pr(A|B)=Pr(A)
b. Pr(A/B)=0
c. Pr(A/B)=Pr(A)/Pr(B)

(Sorry guys can't get the fraction signs working! so / means fraction or divide)

Usually i'd add some working that i did, but i just can't understand the question it self and the notations used.

Hello Year10Student. Welcome to the forum.

Can you please write out the defintion of $Pr(A/B)$??

I know that $Pr(A|B)$ si defined as $Pr(A\cap B)/Pr(B)$. Substituting this, you get in part (a) that $Pr(A\cap B)=Pr(A)Pr(B)$. Thus, by definition, we conclude that $A$ and $B$ are independent events.

If you could tell us the definition of $Pr(A/B)$ then we can help you with the remaining two parts.
 
  • #3
I am not sure but i think it means the same as Pr (A|B)

Thanks!
 
  • #4
Year10Student said:
I am not sure but i think it means the same as Pr (A|B)

Thanks!
If so, does the solution to part (a) give you any ideas?
 
  • #5
caffeinemachine said:
If so, does the solution to part (a) give you any ideas?

I'm not sure if its correct but ill have ago again!

EDIT:

a.

Pr (A and B) / Pr (B) = Pr (A)
Events A and B are independent.
Probability of A occurring doesn't affect the probability of B happening.


b.

P (A and B) / P (B) = 0
A and B are mutually exclusive.
The probability of A and B together equals 0. Meaning they can’t happen together.

c.

P (A and B) / P (B) = P (A) / P (B)
A is a subset of B.
 
  • #6
Year10Student said:
I'm not sure if its correct but ill have ago again!

EDIT:

a.

Pr (A and B) / Pr (B) = Pr (A)
Events A and B are independent.
Probability of A occurring doesn't affect the probability of B happening.


b.

P (A and B) / P (B) = 0
A and B are mutually exclusive.
The probability of A and B together equals 0. Meaning they can’t happen together.

c.

P (A and B) / P (B) = P (A) / P (B)
A is a subset of B.
Yes that's correct!
 
  • #7
caffeinemachine said:
yes that's correct!

thanks caffeinemachine!
 
  • #8
Hi,
For part c), you really can't conclude A is a subset of B. All you can say is that $P(A\setminus B)=0$. That is the probability that A happens and B doesn't is 0. Example: Let the probability space be a square of unit area with the probability of a sub region of the square being the area of the region. Then take a triangle of area one half as a region, including the boundary edges. Imagine throwing a dart at the square. The probability of hitting the triangle is 1/2. Now take B to be the interior of the triangle. The probability of hitting B is also 1/2; i.e. $P(A\cap B)=P(A)$. Clearly A is not a subset of B. This just means the probability of hitting anyone of the 3 edges (each of area 0) is 0.
 
  • #9
johng said:
Hi,
For part c), you really can't conclude A is a subset of B. All you can say is that $P(A\setminus B)=0$. That is the probability that A happens and B doesn't is 0. Example: Let the probability space be a square of unit area with the probability of a sub region of the square being the area of the region. Then take a triangle of area one half as a region, including the boundary edges. Imagine throwing a dart at the square. The probability of hitting the triangle is 1/2. Now take B to be the interior of the triangle. The probability of hitting B is also 1/2; i.e. $P(A\cap B)=P(A)$. Clearly A is not a subset of B. This just means the probability of hitting anyone of the 3 edges (each of area 0) is 0.
Good catch. This is correct. I am sorry I missed that.
 

FAQ: Describing the relationship between two sets A and B (probability)

What is the relationship between two sets A and B?

The relationship between two sets A and B can be described using the concept of probability. Probability is a measure of the likelihood of an event occurring, and it can be used to quantify the relationship between two sets A and B.

How can probability be used to describe the relationship between two sets A and B?

Probability can be used to describe the relationship between two sets A and B by calculating the probability of an event occurring in each set and comparing them. If the probabilities are similar, then the sets may have a strong relationship. If the probabilities are very different, then the sets may have a weak or no relationship.

What is the difference between dependent and independent events when describing the relationship between two sets A and B?

In probability, dependent events are events that are affected by each other, while independent events are events that are not affected by each other. When describing the relationship between two sets A and B, dependent events may indicate a strong relationship between the two sets, while independent events may indicate a weak relationship or no relationship at all.

How does the intersection of two sets A and B relate to their relationship?

The intersection of two sets A and B refers to the elements that are common to both sets. When calculating the probability of an event occurring in both sets, the intersection becomes an important factor. If the intersection is large, it may indicate a strong relationship between the two sets, while a small or nonexistent intersection may indicate a weak or no relationship.

Can the relationship between two sets A and B be described using a single number?

No, the relationship between two sets A and B cannot be fully described using a single number. While probability can provide some insight into the relationship, it does not capture all aspects of the relationship. Other factors such as the size of the sets, the type of events being compared, and the context of the sets may also play a role in understanding the relationship between two sets A and B.

Back
Top