MHB Designing a Markov Model for Coke and Pepsi Purchases

  • Thread starter Thread starter shivajikobardan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Designing Model
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a Markov model and transition matrix to analyze Coke and Pepsi purchases. Key probabilities established are that a current Coke buyer has an 80% chance of buying Coke again, while a Pepsi buyer has a 70% chance of repurchasing Pepsi. Two methods are presented to calculate the probability of a Pepsi user switching to Coke by their fourth purchase, with one method yielding a probability of 0.5625 and the other 0.525. The discrepancy between the two results raises questions about the accuracy of the calculations. Ultimately, participants seek clarification on which approach is correct based on the transition probability matrix.
shivajikobardan
Messages
637
Reaction score
54
Design the markov model and transition matrix for the given data. Answer the following questions based on the mode.
a) If a person purchase coke now the probability of purchase of coke next time is 80%.
b) If a person purchases pepsi now the probability of purchasing pepsi next time is 70%.

Then,
Find the probability of using coke for a current pepsi user in 4th purchases-:

My solution-:
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/4MgnCm3QHosELoWQk-S1rxJ1OjnuObR7yn80p1-UBH4TtJsvKVne-265fdK5QRGJmJ58hxTWn0zalcqpW3P43Bpew9jlbwF11IKw-HDr4aemdDutK2uLMben_diGd5Af3mY-bqgJ0Wen7o3eKGIJ9bA
This is the transition diagram.

This is the transition probability matrix-:

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/26uw6G8iVZc4LPzBfp9Nq3aQq6j79F0QrJ8nPXHQrx2MRflA58zalCsQcxk8mnOWkUqWmP4j3Q_FNYGBtxwADr2eZsM0jUHTNZVpkHg4Y44SaMj888ccO-GRMvvQ0X-WotF14kKK8fa4T29CqNQ
So, what I did was basically to Took this TPM(Transition Probability Matrix) to the power 4. My basis for doing this was this source-: https://www.math.pku.edu.cn/teachers/xirb/Courses/biostatistics/Biostatistics2016/Lecture4.pdf

So what I got was-:

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/3ez2gYlZOB1cji7ALC8QN5flVTZXih24-aGt1m4nIIpx2cM8hGoDvr3ZuD4AyJUQkJJIG7EBB-177CcorBfJXB9Qsniv92JvGHD0K2tDXdjLDJBMOrIea2wHw7iELOLlseZTVZ1_k0qxmkEdao2YGrE
Now I am assuming that the rows means FROM and column side means TO. And the first element of row and column is "Coke". So, to find from Pepsi to Coke, I'd go to second row and first column, the value would be 0.5625

But the problem is that, I've conflicting source which claims the answer is sth else-:

It solves it like this-:

P=TPM

p=Current distribution=[0 1]

Now, for 2nd purchase

p²=p*P=[0.3 0.7]

For 3rd purchase-:
p³=p² * P
=[0.45 0.55]

For 4th purchase-:
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/VlMGXGT6dOGvTEHnelsVuW9Nr1NrPliK5WmhtPSzC86I9zOcj_Z70RzScMByMvnVdcS84flQAgfRLN1pFjpfisz62U06H4VZ_A9dwtswIXQQEelk8n02t87poHNOywHSbQ4dMAhJoggsd3cGMcs

=[0.525 0.475]

Thus, it concludes that the required answer is 0.525.

Which one is correct in your opinion?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Back
Top