Designing bridge not perpendicular with ground

In summary, the conversation discusses the approach to building a bridge at an angle across a 35cm expanse, with one end elevated 5 cm off the ground. The question is how to calculate the forces exerted on each member of the bridge if it is not parallel to the ground. The context suggests that this is for a small/scale model, possibly for a school project.
  • #1
KaylaJ
1
0
I was wondering how to approach building a bridge which must lie across to points of differing points (one end is elevated 5 cm off the ground), meaning the bridge lies at an angle across a 35cm expanse. How would you calculate the forces exerted on each member if the bridge does not lie perpendicular with the ground? Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
KaylaJ said:
I was wondering how to approach building a bridge which must lie across to points of differing points (one end is elevated 5 cm off the ground), meaning the bridge lies at an angle across a 35cm expanse. How would you calculate the forces exerted on each member if the bridge does not lie perpendicular with the ground? Thanks!
Welcome to the PF.

I think you mean to ask about the case where the bridge is not "parallel" to the ground, rather than "perpendicular" to the ground, right? :smile:

What is the context of the question? You are using small dimensions in your question, so I'm assuming that this is a small/scale model of a bridge? Is this for a schoolwork project?
 

FAQ: Designing bridge not perpendicular with ground

1. How can a bridge be designed to not be perpendicular with the ground?

There are several ways to design a bridge to not be perpendicular with the ground. One option is to use a curved design, which can help distribute weight and stress more evenly. Another option is to use a cable-stayed design, where cables are used to support the bridge at an angle.

2. What are the benefits of designing a bridge not perpendicular with the ground?

Designing a bridge not perpendicular with the ground can have several benefits. It can allow for a longer span, as well as provide more flexibility in terms of placement. It can also create a more visually appealing structure.

3. Are there any challenges in designing a bridge not perpendicular with the ground?

Yes, there are challenges in designing a bridge not perpendicular with the ground. One challenge is ensuring structural stability, as the weight and forces must be properly distributed to prevent collapse. Another challenge is the complexity of construction, as it may require specialized techniques and materials.

4. What factors should be considered when designing a bridge not perpendicular with the ground?

When designing a bridge not perpendicular with the ground, factors such as the terrain, surrounding environment, and intended use of the bridge should be considered. The type of materials used, as well as the expected load and traffic, should also be taken into account.

5. Are there any notable examples of bridges not perpendicular with the ground?

Yes, there are several notable examples of bridges not perpendicular with the ground. The Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, California features a curved design, while the Millau Viaduct in France uses a cable-stayed design. The Moses Bridge in the Netherlands is also a unique example, with a sunken design that allows it to blend in with the surrounding landscape.

Back
Top