- #36
kinsler33
- 8
- 0
This calls for some experimentation. To an old-time radio engineer your steel pipe would provide your inner coil with splendid magnetic shielding, and to a first iteration it would do just that. If, however, you were able to provide an alternating magnetic field of sufficient magnitude to magnetically saturate your pipe, then the inner coil (which would not saturate magnetically) would feel that alternating magnetic field and produce some sort of signal in your outer coil.
All this is great except that you'll be looking for the tiniest of signals amid an enormous alternating field, and some exceptionally fancy electronics would likely be needed to filter out the slight distortions caused by the presence of your inner detector coil, and these would likely be swamped out by the hysteresis distortion of the waveform as it magnetically saturates your steel pipe.
Your essential task is to extract some sort of a signal from this assembly, but I don't think an electrical signal will be the best choice. I'd consider acoustics, for while you won't have access to the inner pipe after assembly you likely will be able to listen to the fluid flow down that pipe and also down the outer pipe.
If a single microphone is installed between the pipes you'd be able to hear the dam burst on that one. If you installed an additional microphone far upstream inside the inner pipe you'd be able to calculate the location of the break by measuring the time lapse between the inner mic's signal and the outer mic's signal. You'd need to know the speed of sound in the fluids involved.
All this is great except that you'll be looking for the tiniest of signals amid an enormous alternating field, and some exceptionally fancy electronics would likely be needed to filter out the slight distortions caused by the presence of your inner detector coil, and these would likely be swamped out by the hysteresis distortion of the waveform as it magnetically saturates your steel pipe.
Your essential task is to extract some sort of a signal from this assembly, but I don't think an electrical signal will be the best choice. I'd consider acoustics, for while you won't have access to the inner pipe after assembly you likely will be able to listen to the fluid flow down that pipe and also down the outer pipe.
If a single microphone is installed between the pipes you'd be able to hear the dam burst on that one. If you installed an additional microphone far upstream inside the inner pipe you'd be able to calculate the location of the break by measuring the time lapse between the inner mic's signal and the outer mic's signal. You'd need to know the speed of sound in the fluids involved.