- #36
Ibix
Science Advisor
- 12,496
- 14,560
I don't think it's all that outrageously physics-defying. In Newtonian physics, all we need to do is say that ##F=kGMm/r^2##, where ##k=1## for normal matter and ##k=2## for this hypothetical matter. That ##k## is always 1 is merely something we happen to have observed - there's no other reason for it.DaveC426913 said:Is it falsifiable without invoking physics-defying materials?
Relativity insists that there is a reason, that matter follows geodesics. This means that the coordinate acceleration of a free-falling body cannot depend on its mass, only on its position - i.e. the equivalence principle. So observing masses accelerating at different rates would falsify the equivalence principle.