Detecting Gravitational Waves: Earth-Like Planet Possibility

In summary: I don't see why you say that. There are several versions of the equivalence principle. The one that causes the least misunderstanding and arguments is called the "weak equivalence principle". That says basically that if you drop small masses under identical conditions, they fall at the same rate. The composition of the masses doesn't matter. To put it another way, the equivalence principle is saying there is not inertial mass and gravitational mass - the two sorts of mass are equivalent.Gravitational waves don't really come into the picture at all, they are basically an irrelevant distraction.Anyway, what needs clarifying about your question is what version of the equivalence principle you are using, and
  • #36
DaveC426913 said:
Is it falsifiable without invoking physics-defying materials?
I don't think it's all that outrageously physics-defying. In Newtonian physics, all we need to do is say that ##F=kGMm/r^2##, where ##k=1## for normal matter and ##k=2## for this hypothetical matter. That ##k## is always 1 is merely something we happen to have observed - there's no other reason for it.

Relativity insists that there is a reason, that matter follows geodesics. This means that the coordinate acceleration of a free-falling body cannot depend on its mass, only on its position - i.e. the equivalence principle. So observing masses accelerating at different rates would falsify the equivalence principle.
 
  • Like
Likes roineust and Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
DaveC426913 said:
Not sure this helps the OP.

Is it falsifiable without invoking physics-defying materials?
@Ibix is correct. Since our universe follows the equivalence principle of course a violation will be “physics defying”. But the point is that you can take any pair of materials and perform the experiment. If you ever find one that behaves as @Ibix described then the principle is falsified. Until we did similar experiments it was not a forgone conclusion.
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72 and roineust
  • #38
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
  • #39
Since the OP is on vacation, this thread will remain closed. In short, gravitational waves are a prediction of GR so obviously they do not falsify GR nor any of the basic GR principles.
 

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
904
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
605
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
923
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
927
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
931
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
644
Back
Top