Detector Coverage and Power of Electric Dipole: Calculation and Diagram

In summary, the detector with a radius of 10 cm placed 1 m away from an electric dipole covers a solid angle of approximately 0.00248, assuming 100% detection efficiency. To calculate the fraction of total dipole power detected, the integral of the expression dP/dΩ = (q^2 a^2)/(2πc^3)sin^2θ needs to be taken with respect to omega. The result is P = (q^2 a^2)/(4πc^3) ∫sin^3θ dθ dφ, where θ_0 is the angle calculated in the first section.
  • #1
stunner5000pt
1,461
2

Homework Statement


A detector hjaving a radius 10 cm is placed 1 m away from an electric dipole. What fraction of total solid angle does the detector cover and what fraction of total dipole power does it detect (assuming 100% detection efficiency)

2. The attempt at a solution
I drew the diagram as well maybe that will help. In any case, i think the detector will make a cone (?) with the dipole.Since the base of this triangle has radius of 0.1 m and the height of the triangle is 1m, the apex angle is 5.7 degrees or [itex] 57\pi/180 [/itex]

the total angle swept by the triangle is thus
[tex] \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{5.7\pi/180}\sin\theta\ d \theta d\phi = \frac{5.7\pi}{90}[/tex]

the total angle swept by a sphere is 4pi so the fraction is simply the answer above divided by 4pi. Is that correct?
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    8.3 KB · Views: 399
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You set up the integral correctly, but I get (I find it nice to work exactly when possible, although you'll have to round eventually anyway, so this isn't really that worth it)

[tex] \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\theta_o}\sin\theta\ d \theta d\phi = 2 \pi \left( -\cos \theta |_0^{\theta_o} \right) = 2\pi(1 - \cos\theta_o) [/tex]

Or using [itex]\theta_o = \tan^{-1} (0.1)[/itex]:

[tex] 0.1 = \tan \theta_o = \frac{\sin \theta_o}{\cos \theta_o} = \frac{\sqrt{1-\cos^2 \theta_o}}{\cos \theta_o}[/tex]

[tex] \Rightarrow \cos \theta_o = \frac{1}{\sqrt{ (0.1)^2 + 1 } } [/tex]

So the integral becomes:

[tex] 2\pi \left(1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{ (0.1)^2 + 1 } } \right) \approx 0.00993 \pi [/tex]

For a solid angle of (dividing by [itex] 4\pi[/itex], as you say) .00248Usually, though, it suffices to approximate the solid angle by taking the area of object and dividing by [itex]4\pi r^2[/itex], where r is its distance from the dipole. This ignores the curvature of the sphere, and so is not exact, but is usually a good approximation. In this case, you would get [itex]\pi(0.1)^2/4 \pi (1)^2 = 0.0025[/itex], which is slightly off, but not too bad for most purposes.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
StatusX said:
You set up the integral correctly, but I get (I find it nice to work exactly when possible, although you'll have to round eventually anyway, so this isn't really that worth it)

[tex] \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\theta_o}\sin\theta\ d \theta d\phi = 2 \pi \left( -\cos \theta |_0^{\theta_o} \right) = 2\pi(1 - \cos\theta_o) [/tex]

Or using [itex]\theta_o = \tan^{-1} (0.1)[/itex]:

[tex] 0.1 = \tan \theta_o = \frac{\sin \theta_o}{\cos \theta_o} = \frac{\sqrt{1-\cos^2 \theta_o}}{\cos \theta_o}[/tex]

[tex] \Rightarrow \cos \theta_o = \frac{1}{\sqrt{ (0.1)^2 + 1 } } [/tex]

So the integral becomes:

[tex] 2\pi \left(1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{ (0.1)^2 + 1 } } \right) \approx 0.00993 \pi [/tex]

For a solid angle of (dividing by [itex] 4\pi[/itex], as you say) .00248Usually, though, it suffices to approximate the solid angle by taking the area of object and dividing by [itex]4\pi r^2[/itex], where r is its distance from the dipole. This ignores the curvature of the sphere, and so is not exact, but is usually a good approximation. In this case, you would get [itex]\pi(0.1)^2/4 \pi (1)^2 = 0.0025[/itex], which is slightly off, but not too bad for most purposes.

Thanks a lot

Ok now for the fraction of total dipole power detected (assuming 100% detection efficiency)

the total dipole power detected is given by [tex] \frac{dP}{d\Omega}=\frac{q^2 a^2}{2\pi c^3}\sin^2\theta[/tex]

So i need to integrate the above expression w.r.t. omega?

[tex] P = \frac{q^2 a^2}{4\pi c^3} \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int^{\theta_{0}}_{0}\sin^3\theta d\theta d\phi [/tex]

here theta zero is the angle calculated in the first section??

Is that correct?

I am working in CGS units so the formulas will look like their SI counterparts (obviously)
 

FAQ: Detector Coverage and Power of Electric Dipole: Calculation and Diagram

What is detector coverage and why is it important?

Detector coverage refers to the area that a detector is able to monitor for the presence of an electric dipole. It is important because it determines the range and sensitivity of the detector, allowing for accurate measurements of the electric dipole's power.

How is detector coverage calculated?

Detector coverage is typically calculated by using the detector's field of view and the dipole's distance from the detector. The field of view is the angle at which the detector can detect the dipole, and the distance determines the size of the coverage area.

What factors affect the power of an electric dipole?

The power of an electric dipole is affected by its charge, dipole moment, and orientation. A larger charge or dipole moment will result in a stronger electric field and thus a higher power. The orientation of the dipole also plays a role, as a perpendicular orientation to the detector will result in a stronger signal than a parallel orientation.

How is the power of an electric dipole represented in a diagram?

The power of an electric dipole is typically represented by the length and direction of the electric field lines in a diagram. The longer the lines, the stronger the electric field and thus the higher the power. The direction of the lines also shows the orientation of the dipole.

Can the power of an electric dipole be increased?

Yes, the power of an electric dipole can be increased by increasing its charge or dipole moment. Additionally, placing the dipole closer to the detector or orienting it perpendicular to the detector can also increase its power. However, the maximum power of a dipole is limited by its physical properties and cannot be infinitely increased.

Back
Top