Determine if the space is a subspace testing both closure axioms

In summary, the conversation is discussing how to determine if a given set of vectors in R^2 is a subspace by testing for closure under addition and scalar multiplication. The set is defined as (a,b) where ab=0. The conversation includes examples and explanations of how to test for closure and concludes that the set is not a subspace because it fails the closure under addition test.
  • #1
jackxxny
39
0

Homework Statement


determine if the space is a subspace testing both closure axioms.

in R^2 the set of vectors (a,b) where ab=0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i just used the sum and product which are the closure axioms.

But at the end how do you tell if the resulting vector is a subspace?

(a,b) + (c,d) = (a+c, b+d)

(a+c)(b+d)=0 then ab+cb + ad+dc=0 ab+cb = -ad-dc

then ?

x=constant

x(a,b) = (xa,xb) then abx^2 =0


then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


How about you look at (1, 1) and (1, -1) ?
 
  • #3


If (a,b) and (c,d) are in the set. For it to be a subspace (a+c,b+d) needs to be in the set. To be in the set (a+c).(b+d)=0 needs to be satisfied. Proof that the equality holds. Then do the same for scalar multiplication. If both equalities hold you can conclude it is a subspace.
 
Last edited:
  • #4


so if i set
a=1 , b=1 , c=1 , d=-1


and add (a,b) +(c,d)
i will have 1+1-1-1 = 0

Is that the way to prove it?


is isn't the roduct beetween a and b has to be equal to 0. I understand by that that one of the 2 terms has to be 0 right?
 
  • #5


then if i set (0,12) and (45,0) both are in the set but when i add them

(45,12) they are not in the space anymore right?

45*12 is not equal to 0 right?
 
  • #6


What you say in post 4 is not correct. The sum of both may be zero but separately they aren't even in the subspace, since (1,1), 1*1=1!=0.

What you say in post 5 is correct, because 0*12=45*0=0.

That said is this really the problem? As you've stated the problem it could be read that a and b are vectors in R^2 and they are a subspace when a.b=0 (inner product). I think CompuChip interpreted your question like this.
 
Last edited:
  • #7


Yes, that is an example of how it works. I'm not sure why one would use (1,1), (1,-1). They aren't in the subspace.

As Cyosis began, you can use two arbitrary vectors, X=(a,b) and Y=(c,d) where ab=0 and cd=0. However, investigating closure under addition, X+Y = (a+c,b+d). Let's let e=a+c, f=b+d meaning X + Y = (e,f). For closure to be true, ef=0. Plug back in what e and f are and you get (a+c)(b+d). Does this equal 0? That is, is it in the subspace for arbitrary a,b,c,d?
 
  • #8


so under addition does not work... by it does work under product...

in the end is not a subspace...

it's so good learning the material like that...thanks to all of you...
 
  • #9


Ah, I must apologize.
I misread the condition of "ab equal to 0" as "ab not equal to 0".
 

FAQ: Determine if the space is a subspace testing both closure axioms

What are the two closure axioms that need to be tested to determine if a space is a subspace?

The two closure axioms that need to be tested are closure under addition and closure under scalar multiplication.

How do you test for closure under addition?

To test for closure under addition, you need to check if the sum of any two vectors in the space is also in the space. In other words, if u and v are vectors in the space, then u + v must also be in the space.

How do you test for closure under scalar multiplication?

To test for closure under scalar multiplication, you need to check if the product of any scalar and vector in the space is also in the space. In other words, if c is a scalar and u is a vector in the space, then cu must also be in the space.

What happens if a space fails to satisfy one of the closure axioms?

If a space fails to satisfy one of the closure axioms, then it is not considered a subspace. This means that it does not have all the necessary properties to be considered a subset of the larger vector space.

Can a space satisfy one closure axiom but not the other and still be a subspace?

No, in order for a space to be a subspace, it must satisfy both closure under addition and closure under scalar multiplication. If it fails to satisfy one of these axioms, it cannot be considered a subspace.

Back
Top