MHB Determine its image point after the transformation

AI Thread Summary
The transformation of the graph from y=x^2 to y=-3(x+5)-2 involves a misunderstanding regarding the function's notation. The correct interpretation is y=-3(x+5)^2-2, which indicates a vertical stretch and a downward shift. The point (-3, 9) on the original graph transforms to (2, -29) after applying the mapping rule. The calculations confirm that the transformed coordinates are accurate based on the transformation rules. Clarification on the notation is essential to avoid confusion in the transformation process.
Azurin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The graph of y=x^2 was transformed to the graph of y=-3(x+5)-2. The point (-3, 9) lies on the graph of y=x^2. Determine its image point after the transformations.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Azurin said:
Azurin said:
The graph of y=x^2 was transformed to the graph of y=-3(x+5)-2. The point (-3, 9) lies on the graph of y=x^2. Determine its image point after the transformations.
Skeeter is assuming the function is [math]y= -3(x+5)^2- 2[/math], not [math]y= -3(x+5) 2[/math].
Is that correct?

If so, I would observe that x has 5 added to it and that y (everything done after the squaring) is multiplied by -3 then had 2 subtracted. that is, (x, y) is transformed to (x+ 5, -3y- 2). In particular (-3, 9) is transformed to (-3+ 5, -3(9)- 2)= (2, -29).

Check- yes, if x= 2, [math]y= -3(-2+ 5)^2- 2= -3(3)^2- 2= -27- 2= -29[/math].
 
Last edited:
You wrote
The graph of y=x^2 was transformed to the graph of y=-3(x+5)-2.

Did you mean "y= -3(x+ 5)^2- 2" or just "y= -3(x+ 5)^2"? In other words, did you drop the "^" or did you type "-" instead of "^"?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top