Determine limits of integration in double integral change of variables

  • #1
zenterix
702
84
Homework Statement
Show that if ##h(t)=f(t)*g(t)## then ##H(s)=F(s)G(s)##.
Relevant Equations
where capital letters represent the Laplace transform of the lowercase variables.
$$h(t)=f(t)*g(t)=\int_0^t f(\tau)g(t-\tau)d\tau=\int_0^t g(\tau)f(t-\tau)d\tau\tag{1}$$

The Laplace transform is

$$H(s)=\int_0^\infty h(t)e^{-st}dt=\int_0^\infty\left ( \int_0^t g(\tau)f(t-\tau)d\tau\right )e^{-st}dt\tag{2}$$

The Laplace transforms of $f$ and $g$ are

$$F(s)=\int_0^\infty f(x)e^{-sx}dx\tag{3}$$

$$G(s)=\int_0^\infty g(y)e^{-sy}dy\tag{4}$$

Now let's check what ##F(s)G(s)## is.

$$F(s)G(s)=\int_0^\infty\int_0^\infty f(x)e^{-sx}g(y)e^{-sy}dxdy\tag{5}$$

We now make a change of variables.

$$x=X(t,\tau)=t-\tau$$

$$y=Y(t,\tau)=\tau$$

The Jacobian of this mapping is

$$J(\tau,t)=\begin{vmatrix} -1&1\\1&0\end{vmatrix}=-1$$

and so

$$|J(\tau,t)|=1$$

The double integral (5) becomes

$$\int\int g(\tau)f(t-\tau)e^{-st}d\tau dt\tag{6}$$

My question is: how do I find the limits of integration in (6)? What is a good strategy for reasoning about such a task?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The region of integration of (5) is the first quadrant in the ##xy##-plane.

My first thought is that since ##y=\tau## then ##\tau## goes from ##0## to ##\infty##.

However, this doesn't work for ##x##.

For a given ##t##, since ##x>0## then ##\tau## goes from ##0## to ##t##.

It seems that the mapping is

1711773980024.png


$$\int_0^\infty\int_0^t g(\tau)f(t-\tau)e^{-st}d\tau dt$$
 
  • #3
The integration region for x and y is ##x > 0## and ##y > 0##. Replace by the expressions with ##t## and ##\tau## and you get
$$
t-\tau > 0, \quad \tau > 0.
$$
Move ##\tau## to the rhs of the first: ##t > \tau##. The integration region is therefore ##t > \tau > 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes zenterix

FAQ: Determine limits of integration in double integral change of variables

What are the limits of integration in a double integral?

The limits of integration in a double integral define the region over which the integration is performed. These limits are typically functions or constants that describe the boundaries of the region in the coordinate plane. In Cartesian coordinates, they are often written as \([a, b]\) for the outer integral and \([g(x), h(x)]\) for the inner integral.

How do you determine the new limits of integration when changing variables in a double integral?

To determine the new limits of integration when changing variables in a double integral, you need to express the original region of integration in terms of the new variables. This often involves solving equations to find the new boundaries in the transformed coordinate system. The Jacobian determinant is also used to account for the change in area element when transforming the variables.

What is the role of the Jacobian determinant in changing variables for double integrals?

The Jacobian determinant is crucial when changing variables in a double integral because it accounts for the distortion of the area element due to the transformation. When you change variables, the area element \(dA\) in the original coordinates is transformed to the new coordinates, and the Jacobian determinant provides the scaling factor needed to adjust the integrand accordingly.

Can you provide an example of changing variables in a double integral?

Sure! Consider the double integral \(\iint_{R} f(x, y) \, dA\) where \(R\) is a region in the \(xy\)-plane. Suppose we change to polar coordinates \((r, \theta)\) where \(x = r \cos \theta\) and \(y = r \sin \theta\). The new limits of integration would be determined by the region \(R\) in polar coordinates, and the Jacobian determinant \(r\) is used. The integral becomes \(\iint_{R'} f(r \cos \theta, r \sin \theta) \, r \, dr \, d\theta\).

What are common mistakes when determining limits of integration in a double integral change of variables?

Common mistakes include incorrectly identifying the new region of integration, forgetting to include the Jacobian determinant, and misinterpreting the boundaries of the transformed variables. It is also easy to make algebraic errors when solving for the new limits, so careful attention to detail and verification of the transformed region are essential.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
848
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
893
Back
Top