Determine the position and magnitude of the max bending moment

In summary, Homework Equations:-The Attempt at a Solution:The user is having difficulty in their homework and is looking for help. They are trying to calculate the position and magnitude of the maximum bending moment for a simply supported beam with a concentrated load at the center. They have tried different methods and are not able to find a correct answer. They are working to correct an error in their original method.
  • #36
Al_Pa_Cone said:
View attachment 233888
View attachment 233889
I have redrawn the diagram to show the idea. I have started with working out the net weight of the lid as a UDL and worked out 1000g into Newtons = 9.81N. as a UDL this would be 9.81/0.6m = 16.35N.
For the purpose of calculating the counterweight's mass, no need to figure out the force in Newtons. Mass ratio is inverse of distance ratio.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
So the overall weight of the lid would be 1000g but 100mm of it is beyond the left of the tipping point. So would I be correct by starting to divide the weight by 600mm.
1000g/600mm*500mm = 833.3g to the right of the pivot point.166.7g to the left and this ratio would be 1:5. so the weight required of the counterweight would need to be x4 of the left stub.
 
  • #38
Al_Pa_Cone said:
So the overall weight of the lid would be 1000g but 100mm of it is beyond the left of the tipping point. So would I be correct by starting to divide the weight by 600mm.
1000g/600mm*500mm = 833.3g to the right of the pivot point.166.7g to the left and this ratio would be 1:5. so the weight required of the counterweight would need to be x4 of the left stub.
It is simpler to leave the lid as a single weight but find its mass centre and use the displacement of that for the torque.
 
Last edited:
  • #39
So to find the mass centre would I be looking to 50% of 833.3g mass to the right of the pivot (416.65g).
I thought if the setup is effectively a seesaw then to balance each side equally then it would only take a small change in mass at one side to tip the balance and open the lid?
 
  • #40
Al_Pa_Cone said:
So to find the mass centre would I be looking to 50% of 833.3g mass to the right of the pivot (416.65g).
I thought if the setup is effectively a seesaw then to balance each side equally then it would only take a small change in mass at one side to tip the balance and open the lid?
The whole lid is 1kg and 0.6m wide. Its mass centre is 0.3m from each edge, so 0.2m from the pivot. Its torque about the pivot is (0.2m)(1kg)(g).
If the suspended mass is m, its torque the other way is (0.1m)(mg).
So to balance you will need m=2kg.
 
  • #41
upload_2018-11-14_23-0-29.png

So the torque about the pivot is equal to the counterweight mass effectively making the -2000g(clockwise torque being negative) + 2000g(the counterweight anticlockwise torque) = 0 Torque so no movement.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-11-14_23-0-29.png
    upload_2018-11-14_23-0-29.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 763
  • #42
Al_Pa_Cone said:
View attachment 234025
So the torque about the pivot is equal to the counterweight mass effectively making the -2000g(clockwise torque being negative) + 2000g(the counterweight anticlockwise torque) = 0 Torque so no movement.
Yes.
 
  • #43
upload_2018-11-14_23-21-10.png

I am trying to understand how the mass at twice the distance to the right of the pivot can be equal to the mass balancing it at half the distance to the left of the pivot?

haruspex said:
Its torque about the pivot is (0.2m)(1kg)(g).
If the suspended mass is m, its torque the other way is (0.1m)(mg).
So to balance you will need m=2kg.

From your information I worked out the torque about the pivot to be 0.2 x 1000g x 10 which gives 2000g at 0.2m and the counterweight mass to be 2000g at 0.1 to the left? I would have expected it to be double to compesate for the distance?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-11-14_23-21-0.png
    upload_2018-11-14_23-21-0.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 324
  • upload_2018-11-14_23-21-10.png
    upload_2018-11-14_23-21-10.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 383
  • #44
Al_Pa_Cone said:
0.2 x 1000g x 10 which gives 2000g at 0.2m
No, it gives 200g gram-meters.
(To avoid confusion, let's write out gram in full and reserve 'g' gravitational acceleration. Alternatively, we can switch to kg.)
That's a torque, so it is not "at" anywhere. You have already used the 0.2m info.
It balances the 2000 gram x 0.1m x g = 200g gram-meter (or 2 Newton-meter) torque from the suspended mass.
I note that in your diagram in post #43 you have written that the mass of the lid is now 2000 grams. I assume you meant it has a torque of 2 Newton-meters.
 
  • #45
Yes, I was trying to visually represent the Torque as it helps me to try and understand the logic of the situation. I think my fault in understanding your method is because I have not used the units gram-meters anywhere in my course so far and I am unfamiliar with it. I have just googled a gram-meter and know I understand its value to a Newton meter.

Thank you for all your help. I owe you a pint or two!
 
  • #46
Al_Pa_Cone said:
Yes, I was trying to visually represent the Torque as it helps me to try and understand the logic of the situation. I think my fault in understanding your method is because I have not used the units gram-meters anywhere in my course so far and I am unfamiliar with it. I have just googled a gram-meter and know I understand its value to a Newton meter.

Thank you for all your help. I owe you a pint or two!
It would be better to stick to standard MKS units. (And it looks like I did not need to use US spelling!)
So that'd be 0.57 to 1.14 litres, right?
 
  • #47
Yeah If you drink your pints by the litre I always have a couple, so in that case I owe you 3.51951 Pints. Cheers!
 
  • #48
upload_2018-11-15_23-1-11.png

I was checking my initial calculations regarding the weight of the cat impacting the roof from 1 metre and I got 442Nm of force in my method. I have just recalculated and got 44.2Nm. Does this look correct in the method?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-11-15_23-1-11.png
    upload_2018-11-15_23-1-11.png
    14.9 KB · Views: 719
  • #49
Al_Pa_Cone said:
View attachment 234080
I was checking my initial calculations regarding the weight of the cat impacting the roof from 1 metre and I got 442Nm of force in my method. I have just recalculated and got 44.2Nm. Does this look correct in the method?
Please create a new thread for this. It is a forum standard that each distinct problem has its own thread. I should have insisted on that for the lid counterweight question.
If you want to make sure I see it, put @haruspex in the text.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
490
Back
Top