MHB Determine the speed of the parachutist

  • Thread starter Thread starter kayella19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the speed of a parachutist after the parachute opens, starting from an initial speed of 176 ft/s. The net force acting on the parachutist is analyzed using Newton's second law, incorporating weight and drag, leading to a differential equation for velocity. There is some confusion regarding the correct formulation of the drag force, with participants questioning whether it should be proportional to \( Wv^2/225 \) or another form. The conversation highlights the importance of clarifying the drag equation to solve the problem accurately. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for precise definitions in physics problems to derive the correct speed function over time.
kayella19
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A parachutist is falling with speed 176 ft/s when his parachute opens. If the air resistance is Wv2/225 lb where W is the total weight of the man and the parachute and v is in ft/s, find his speed as a function of time after the parachute opens.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Anyone can solve this?

I would begin by analyzing the net force on the parachutist as he falls after his parachute has opened. He has his weight $W$ pulling him down, and he has drag $D$ opposing his weight:

$$F_{\text{net}}=W-D$$

Using Newton's second law of motion, the given drag function, and the fact that acceleration is the time rate of change of velocity, this becomes:

$$m\d{v}{t}=W-kWv^2$$ where we are given $$k=\frac{1}{225}$$

$$m\d{v}{t}=mg-kmgv^2$$

$$\d{v}{t}=g\left(1-kv^2\right)$$

Can you identify the type of ODE we have?
 
But how how would K is equal to 1/225?
 
kayella19 said:
But how how would K is equal to 1/225?

There was some ambiguity in how the drag (air resistance) was given...is it:

$$D=\frac{1}{225}Wv^2$$

or:

$$D=\frac{2}{225}Wv$$

or something else?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top