Determining ratio of a 2 part mix

  • MHB
  • Thread starter rustyskills
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Ratio
In summary, the conversation discusses the weight of mechanically and thermally reconditioned sand and the importance of accurately measuring the percentage of each type of sand in a mix. The conversation includes equations and calculations to determine the percentage of each type of sand in the mix, with the final result being 28.2% mechanically reconditioned sand and 71.8% thermally reconditioned sand. The conversation also mentions the practical application of math in the foundry and the gratitude for help with the calculations.
  • #1
rustyskills
3
0
Mechanically reconditioned sand weighs 8.50#/gallon
Thermally reclaimed sand weighs 8.89#/gallon
A mix of these two kinds of sand weighs 8.78#/gallon
What is the % thermal and %mechanical in the mix?

I work in a foundry and we feed these two types of sand into a hopper that feeds a mixer. It's important to have a quick and reliable test that can be done on the shop floor that confirms that the mix is 60/40 or 70/30 etc.

I looked at a lot of calculators and examples online but didn't find any that fit the data I have collected. I sure would appreciate some help. Anyone want to set me straight on this? Thx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let's let $M$ be the percentage of mechanically reconditioned sand and $T$ be the percentage of thermally reconditioned sand.

So, we know that:

\(\displaystyle M+T=100\)

And we also know:

\(\displaystyle 850M+889T=87800\)

Solving this system, we find:

\(\displaystyle M=\frac{1100}{39}\approx28.2,\,T=\frac{2800}{39}\approx71.8\)

You could also state:

\(\displaystyle M:T=11:28\)
 
  • #3
modern day (math) warrior, mean mean stride...
thank you. I can duplicate that but I don't fully understand it yet.
I get the 850M + 889T = 87800
can you show me a little more about how you got to the rest?
much appreciated.
 
  • #4
Suppose we take the first equation:

\(\displaystyle M+T=100\)

and multiply it by $-850$, so that it becomes:

\(\displaystyle -850M-850T=-85000\)

Now, recall we have:

\(\displaystyle 850M+889T=87800\)

Adding these two equation, we will eliminate $M$, to get:

\(\displaystyle 39T=2800\)

which gives us:

\(\displaystyle T=\frac{2800}{39}\)

And then taking the original first equation, and using this value for $T$, we have:

\(\displaystyle M=100-\frac{2800}{39}=\frac{1100}{39}\)
 
  • #5
There it is! I guess this answers the age old question "Why do I have to learn this- I'll never use it." Math in the foundry... I thank you.
I still have some R&R concerns regarding sampling technique but we can easily test and measure that. The roadblock was the calculation of the mix and you have cleared that right up.
 

FAQ: Determining ratio of a 2 part mix

What is a 2 part mix?

A 2 part mix refers to a type of mixture that requires two different components to be mixed together in specific proportions.

How do you determine the ratio of a 2 part mix?

The ratio of a 2 part mix can be determined by dividing the amount of one component by the amount of the other component. For example, if the mix requires 2 parts of component A and 1 part of component B, the ratio would be 2:1.

Why is it important to determine the ratio of a 2 part mix?

The ratio of a 2 part mix is important because it ensures that the final mixture has the desired properties and functions properly. Using the wrong ratio can result in an ineffective or even dangerous mixture.

What tools can be used to measure the components of a 2 part mix?

There are various tools that can be used to measure the components of a 2 part mix, such as measuring cups, beakers, syringes, or scales. The specific tool needed will depend on the consistency and amount of the components being measured.

Can the ratio of a 2 part mix be adjusted?

Yes, the ratio of a 2 part mix can be adjusted by changing the amounts of each component used. However, it is important to carefully follow the recommended ratio to ensure the desired outcome of the mixture.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top