MHB Dharshan's question via email about a Laplace Transform

AI Thread Summary
The Laplace Transform of the function 5sin(11t)sinh(11t) is evaluated using the identity for sinh and properties of Laplace Transforms. The process involves breaking down the function into its exponential components and applying the transform to each part. The final expression can be simplified to either a complex fraction or left in a more expanded form. The transforms used in the calculations are confirmed to be correct, although the final algebraic simplification may require further verification. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful algebraic manipulation in obtaining the final result.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Evaluate $\displaystyle \mathcal{L}\left\{ 5\sin{ \left( 11 \, t \right) } \sinh{ \left( 11\,t \right) } \right\} $.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*}
\mathcal{L} \left\{ 5\sin{ \left( 11\,t \right) } \sinh{ \left( 11\,t \right) } \right\} &= \mathcal{L} \left\{ 5\sin{ \left( 11\,t \right) } \cdot \frac{1}{2} \left( \mathrm{e}^{11\,t} - \mathrm{e}^{-11\,t} \right) \right\} \\
&= \frac{5}{2} \,\mathcal{L} \left\{ \mathrm{e}^{11\,t} \sin{ \left( 11\,t \right) } - \mathrm{e}^{-11\,t} \sin{ \left( 11\,t \right) } \right\} \\
&= \frac{5}{2} \left[ \mathcal{L}\left\{ \mathrm{e}^{11\,t}\sin{ \left( 11\,t \right) } \right\} - \mathcal{L}\left\{ \mathrm{e}^{-11\,t} \sin{ \left( 11\,t \right) } \right\} \right] \\
&= \frac{5}{2} \left\{ \left[ \frac{11}{s^2 + 11^2} \right]_{s \to s - 11} - \left[ \frac{11}{s^2 + 11^2} \right]_{s \to s + 11} \right\} \\
&= \frac{55}{2} \left[ \frac{1}{\left( s - 11 \right) ^2 + 121} - \frac{1}{\left( s + 11 \right) ^2 + 121} \right]
\end{align*} $

It would be fine to leave your answer in this form, but if you get a common denominator and simplify, you could write the answer as $\displaystyle \frac{1210\,s}{s^4 + 58564}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
the transforms are correct, I didn’t check the algebra on your last simplification.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top