Diagonalizability of a matrix containing smaller diagonalizable matrices

In summary, the conversation discusses a proof for the diagonalizability of a matrix R given two diagonalizable matrices A and D with no shared eigenvalues. The conversation also touches on finding eigenvectors and eigenvalues for R using those of A and D, and determining that R has no other eigenvalues.
  • #1
oferon
30
0
Please don't mind my math english, I'm really not used to it yet..

Given [itex]R\in M_n(F)[/itex] and two matrices [itex]A\in M_{n1}(F)[/itex] and [itex]D\in M_{n2}(F)[/itex] where [itex]n1+n2=n[/itex]
[itex]R = \begin{pmatrix} A & B \\ 0 & D \end{pmatrix}[/itex]
Given A,D both diagonalizable (over F), and don't share any identical eigenvalues - Prove that R is diagonalizable.

Ok, So what i did was building eigenvectors for R, based on the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A and D.
for example, suppose [itex]λ_1 [/itex] is eigenvalue of A with eigenvector [itex]V = \begin{pmatrix} V1 \\ V2 \\. \\. \\. \end{pmatrix}[/itex], then taking [itex]U = \begin{pmatrix} V1 \\ V2 \\. \\. \\0 \\0\\0\end{pmatrix}[/itex] would give [itex]R*U = λ_1*U[/itex] thus λ1,U are eigenvalue and vector of R

I managed to do the same using D. So now I have a set of eigenvalues and vectors of R.
My question is - How can I tell that R has no other eigenvalues other than those of A and D, and finish my proof... Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
So you've shown that ##R## has ##n## linearly independent eigenvectors, since they come from different two matrices with no overlapping eigenvalues, and also where an eigenvalue does repeat within either ##A## or ##D##, the geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue is equal to its algebraic multiplicity (because ##A## and ##D## are both diagonalisable). Therefore, we can already write ##R## in the form ##PD P^{-1}## in the standard way; that is, ##R## is diagonalisable.

On the other hand, suppose there exists another eigenvalue of ##R## not covered by the eigenvalues of ##A## and ##D##. Then there must correspond an eigenvector that is linearly independent of all of the other eigenvectors of ##R##. But this means the eigenvectors of ##R## spans ##n+1## dimensions, which is not possible. So you cannot have another eigenvalue.
 
  • #3
Thanks for your reply.
I still don't get it - I never said I found n eigenvectors. I said I found vectors for all eigen values of A and D.
How can you tell A gives total of n1 and D gives total of n2 vectors?
 
  • #4
If an ##n\times n## matrix is diagonalisable, then it must have ##n## linearly independent eigenvectors. If you have a repeated eigenvalue with multiplicity ##k##, then the dimension of the corresponding eigenspace must also be ##k##. Is it possible you haven't found all the eigenvectors corresponding to each eigenvalue?
 

FAQ: Diagonalizability of a matrix containing smaller diagonalizable matrices

What is diagonalizability of a matrix?

Diagonalizability of a matrix refers to the property of a square matrix where it can be transformed into a diagonal matrix through a similarity transformation.

Can a non-square matrix be diagonalizable?

No, diagonalizability is a property that only applies to square matrices.

How do smaller diagonalizable matrices affect the diagonalizability of a larger matrix?

If all the smaller diagonalizable matrices are also diagonalizable, then the larger matrix will also be diagonalizable. However, if even one of the smaller matrices is not diagonalizable, then the larger matrix will not be diagonalizable.

What is the importance of diagonalizability in matrices?

Diagonalizability allows for easier calculations and analysis of matrix operations, as well as providing insight into the behavior and properties of the matrix.

How can I determine if a matrix is diagonalizable?

A matrix is diagonalizable if and only if it has n linearly independent eigenvectors, where n is the size of the matrix. It can also be determined by checking if the matrix is similar to a diagonal matrix.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
690
Replies
6
Views
783
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top