- #36
Bystander
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
- 5,623
- 1,756
zoobyshoe said:Bystander, I think what I am hearing you say is that you don't want to consider the possibility that he was seriously nuts.
Ya dun thunk one step too far --- it's been considered, and pretty much dismissed. I'm not saying I've tracked down "smoking guns" for sources on all the stories.
I can understand that because it leads to the questions of responsibility.
Good point --- in that it illustrates that we've been discussing this in two different contexts --- get to that in a moment.
My reasoning goes in a different direction: if people had only had the savvy to recognise that he was nuts at the start, they would never have let him get anywhere.
Thomas Eagleburger (or is it 3 "e"s?) was the only certified sane candidate for an office a heartbeat away from becoming POTUS --- he got dropped like a hot potato in '72 when that fact became public.
Okay, contexts: I'll hypothesize that you analyze WW II within the context of Studs Terkel's Last Good War; we were the good guys, wore white hats, saved the world for democracy? Or, am I barking up the wrong tree? I'll stop here --- don't want to waste time developing my context if I've misread yours.