- #1
- 7,903
- 15
Nasa has decided to weigh in as part of Sony's publicity machine for their new movie.
They have a page attempting to dissuade people that 2012 isn't the end of the world.
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012.html
But why did 2012 need anything like the "planning and analysis of Y2K"?
Did Nasa really spend $millions checking the facts?
Do they intend to cut short a shuttle mission so it won't be in orbit in 2012 like they did for Y2K?
They have a page attempting to dissuade people that 2012 isn't the end of the world.
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012.html
Not sure if Nasa is being ironic here (now that would be a major discovery, evidence of irony at a federal agency).2012: Beginning of the End or Why the World Won't End?
>Remember the Y2K scare? It came and went without much of a whimper because of adequate planning and analysis of the situation.
But why did 2012 need anything like the "planning and analysis of Y2K"?
Did Nasa really spend $millions checking the facts?
Do they intend to cut short a shuttle mission so it won't be in orbit in 2012 like they did for Y2K?