- #1
256bits
Gold Member
- 3,916
- 1,955
There is an episode of Star Trek where Kirk and Spock use a mortar with a nuclear explosive head against an alien threat.
At the time I had thought that it was an interesting device, but completely futuristic. But, as I have learned, it does seem that in this instance, Star Trek had copied from a real working technological device.
The device is discontinued for service troops with good reason.
In the 50's, 60's, 70's ingenious minds could come up with crafty use of such a small kilo-ton device other than military, such as espoused in magazines such as Popular Mechanics or Popular Science, such as excavation, dam building or whatever.
It never caught on as being practical or necessary. AFAIK, no Earth movement was ever tested with such a device.
I guess possible questions would be:
1. Was there ever a test for Earth movement?
2. How many other "new" technologies on Star Trek were actual adaptations of technology of the day.?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nuclear_device)
( Half science and half fiction, so could be in the incorrect sub-topic, except for the nuclear part )
At the time I had thought that it was an interesting device, but completely futuristic. But, as I have learned, it does seem that in this instance, Star Trek had copied from a real working technological device.
The device is discontinued for service troops with good reason.
In the 50's, 60's, 70's ingenious minds could come up with crafty use of such a small kilo-ton device other than military, such as espoused in magazines such as Popular Mechanics or Popular Science, such as excavation, dam building or whatever.
It never caught on as being practical or necessary. AFAIK, no Earth movement was ever tested with such a device.
I guess possible questions would be:
1. Was there ever a test for Earth movement?
2. How many other "new" technologies on Star Trek were actual adaptations of technology of the day.?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nuclear_device)
( Half science and half fiction, so could be in the incorrect sub-topic, except for the nuclear part )