Difference between product and pullback

In summary, the categorical product of two objects is the same as the fiber product (pullback) of two morphisms with the same two objects as domains. However, in the definition, the morphisms may appear superfluous due to commutativity. It is possible to display a category where products and pullbacks are not equal, depending on the definition of product. In the category of abelian groups, the pullback varies depending on the morphisms, but if they are trivial, the pullback is the regular direct product of the domains.
  • #1
espen180
834
2
What exactly is the difference between the categorical product of two objects and the fiber product (pullback) of two morphisms with the same two objects as domains? However I look at it, the morphisms in the definition appear superfluous.

Can anyone display a category where products and pullbacks generally are not equal?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is your definition of the product of two morphisms?
 
  • #3
I guess a reasonable definition is to do it in a slice category.
When I work it out, I get the same diagram as with a pullback, but with two extra morphisms, but these are superfluous due to commutativity, so the pullback is the product of two objects in a slice category, or of two mophisms with a shared codomain.

From wiki:
225px-Categorical_pullback_%28expanded%29.svg.png


But it seems that this forces the domain of the pullback to be the product of X and Y with p1 and p2 beign the usual projection morphisms. Is this not the case?

Edit: I was mistaken. Of course, the pullback depends on the morphisms. For example in the category of abelian groups, if the two morphisms are trivial, the pullback is the trivial group, but if they are injective, the pullback is the regular product of the domains, correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
espen180 said:
Edit: I was mistaken. Of course, the pullback depends on the morphisms. For example in the category of abelian groups, if the two morphisms are trivial, the pullback is the trivial group, but if they are injective, the pullback is the regular product of the domains, correct?
No. If the morphisms are trivial (i.e. send everything to the identity) then the pullback is the regular direct product of the domains. If they are injective the pullback varies, depending on what the morphisms are. For example consider the pullback along id:G->G and id:G->G. As a set, it's ##\{(g_1,g_2) \colon g_1=g_2\}##, i.e., it's the diagonal in ##G\times G##.
 
  • #5
The pullback of f: X → Z and g: Y → Z is their product in the slice category of objects over Z.

The product of X and Y is the pullback of X → 1 and Y → 1, where 1 is the terminal object.
 

FAQ: Difference between product and pullback

What is the difference between a product and a pullback in mathematics?

A product in mathematics refers to a mathematical construction that combines two or more mathematical objects to create a new object. A pullback, on the other hand, refers to a specific type of product that is defined in category theory. It is a way of combining two objects in a category while preserving certain relationships between them.

How is a product different from a pullback in terms of their definitions?

The definition of a product involves two objects and a binary operation, while the definition of a pullback involves three objects and two morphisms. In a product, the two objects are combined using the binary operation, whereas in a pullback, the two objects are related to each other through the two morphisms.

What are some examples of products and pullbacks in mathematics?

Some examples of products in mathematics include the Cartesian product of two sets, the product of two vector spaces, and the direct product of two groups. Examples of pullbacks include the fiber product of two schemes in algebraic geometry and the pullback of a differential form along a smooth map in differential geometry.

In what ways are products and pullbacks useful in mathematics?

Products and pullbacks are useful in mathematics as they allow us to construct new objects from existing ones while preserving certain important relationships. This is particularly useful in algebraic structures such as groups and rings, where products and pullbacks can help us define new operations. In category theory, products and pullbacks play a central role in defining limits and colimits, which are important concepts in understanding the structure of categories.

Can a product and a pullback be equivalent in certain cases?

Yes, a product and a pullback can be equivalent in certain cases. For example, in the category of sets, the Cartesian product of two sets can be seen as a pullback of the two sets along the projections onto the two sets. However, in general, products and pullbacks are distinct concepts with different definitions and properties.

Back
Top