Differential equation using power series method

In summary, the power series method for solving differential equations involves expressing the solution as a power series and substituting it into the differential equation. This process typically starts with assuming a solution in the form of a series, often centered around a point (usually zero), and involves determining the coefficients of the series by equating terms of the same degree after substituting into the equation. This method is particularly useful for linear differential equations with variable coefficients and can lead to solutions that are expressed as infinite series, which can be truncated for practical applications. The convergence of the series and the interval of validity are important considerations in this approach.
  • #1
Graham87
70
16
TL;DR Summary
Differential equation using power series method
I am attempting to solve this differential equation with power series
Screenshot 2023-12-20 135848.png


I came with the following solution but I doubt it is correct.
Screenshot 2023-12-20 140010.png

Screenshot 2023-12-20 140022.png


Since x=1 we get:
Screenshot 2023-12-20 140039.png

Screenshot 2023-12-20 140053.png

Screenshot 2023-12-20 140111.png

I doubt its correctness because it looks messy. Also the convergence radian R goes to 0, giving only a solution for x=0 which is not correct, since the beginning condition states y(1)=2.
Screenshot 2023-12-20 140120.png
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-12-20 140022.png
    Screenshot 2023-12-20 140022.png
    9.4 KB · Views: 51
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you set [itex]y(x) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k(x - 1)^k[/itex] then [itex]x[/itex] cannot appear in the recurrence relation for [itex]c_k[/itex]; the [itex]c_k[/itex] are supposed to be independent of [itex]x[/itex]. You need to write [tex]\begin{split}(x + 3)y' &=
(x - 1 + 4)\sum_{k=1}^\infty kc_k (x-1)^{k-1} \\
&= \sum_{k=1}^\infty kc_k (x - 1)^k + 4\sum_{k=1}^\infty kc_k (x- 1)^{k-1} \end{split}[/tex] and then compare coefficients of [itex](x-1)^k[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes Graham87
  • #3
pasmith said:
If you set [itex]y(x) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k(x - 1)^k[/itex] then [itex]x[/itex] cannot appear in the recurrence relation for [itex]c_k[/itex]; the [itex]c_k[/itex] are supposed to be independent of [itex]x[/itex]. You need to write [tex]\begin{split}(x + 3)y' &=
(x - 1 + 4)\sum_{k=1}^\infty kc_k (x-1)^{k-1} \\
&= \sum_{k=1}^\infty kc_k (x - 1)^k + 4\sum_{k=1}^\infty kc_k (x- 1)^{k-1} \end{split}[/tex] and then compare coefficients of [itex](x-1)^k[/itex].
Oh, I tried that too but did not go through it completely. So I get thefollowing:
Screenshot 2023-12-20 162206.png

Screenshot 2023-12-20 162211.png

Screenshot 2023-12-20 162217.png

However the general solution formula does not seem obvious. Where might I have gone wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
You can write the ODE as [tex]
\sum_{k=0}^\infty ( kc_k + 4(k+1)c_{k+1} + 2c_k )(x-1)^k = 0[/tex] from which it follows that [tex]
c_{k+1} = -\frac{k+2}{4(k+1)}c_k, \quad k \geq 0.[/tex] This linear first-order recurrence can be easily solved, since the general solution of [tex]
a_{k+1} = f(k)a_k[/tex] is [tex]
a_k = a_0 \prod_{r=0}^{k-1} f(r).[/tex] Note that by inspection [itex]y = A(x + 3)^{-2}[/itex] is the general solution of [itex](x + 3)y' + 2y = 0[/itex] so that you can check your answer against [tex]\begin{split}
y(x) &= 16y(1)(x + 3)^{-2} \\
&= 16y(1)(x - 1 + 4)^{-2} \\
&= y(1) \left(1 + \frac{x-1}{4}\right)^{-2} \\
&= y(1) \left(1 - 2\frac{x-1}4 + \dots
+ \frac{(-2)(-3) \cdots (-n - 1)}{n!}\left(\frac{x-1}4\right)^n + \dots \right)\end{split}[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes Graham87
  • #5
pasmith said:
You can write the ODE as [tex]
\sum_{k=0}^\infty ( kc_k + 4(k+1)c_{k+1} + 2c_k )(x-1)^k = 0[/tex] from which it follows that [tex]
c_{k+1} = -\frac{k+2}{4(k+1)}c_k, \quad k \geq 0.[/tex] This linear first-order recurrence can be easily solved, since the general solution of [tex]
a_{k+1} = f(k)a_k[/tex] is [tex]
a_k = a_0 \prod_{r=0}^{k-1} f(r).[/tex] Note that by inspection [itex]y = A(x + 3)^{-2}[/itex] is the general solution of [itex](x + 3)y' + 2y = 0[/itex] so that you can check your answer against [tex]\begin{split}
y(x) &= 16y(1)(x + 3)^{-2} \\
&= 16y(1)(x - 1 + 4)^{-2} \\
&= y(1) \left(1 + \frac{x-1}{4}\right)^{-2} \\
&= y(1) \left(1 - 2\frac{x-1}4 + \dots
+ \frac{(-2)(-3) \cdots (-n - 1)}{n!}\left(\frac{x-1}4\right)^n + \dots \right)\end{split}[/tex]
I tried that, but I get stuck in the manipulation on the most left sum to k=0?
Screenshot 2023-12-20 162206.png

From your answer it turned to this somehow?
Screenshot 2023-12-20 181951.png

Shouldn't the most left term be
Screenshot 2023-12-20 183210.png
 
Last edited:
  • #6
No; [tex]
(x-1)y' = \sum_{k=1}^\infty kc_k(x-1)^k = \sum_{k=0}^\infty kc_k(x-1)^k[/tex] because [itex]0c_0(x-1)^0 = 0[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes Graham87
  • #7
pasmith said:
No; [tex]
(x-1)y' = \sum_{k=1}^\infty kc_k(x-1)^k = \sum_{k=0}^\infty kc_k(x-1)^k[/tex] because [itex]0c_0(x-1)^0 = 0[/itex].
Yeah, I realised that too! Thanks alot!
 
  • #8
pasmith said:
No; [tex]
(x-1)y' = \sum_{k=1}^\infty kc_k(x-1)^k = \sum_{k=0}^\infty kc_k(x-1)^k[/tex] because 0c0(x−1)0=0.
Are you sure about this?
I did like this:
Screenshot 2023-12-20 192440.png

And since x=1 we get the following
Screenshot 2023-12-20 192448.png

And eventually
Screenshot 2023-12-20 192615.png

Screenshot 2023-12-20 192625.png
 
  • #9
The fundamental issue here is that [tex](x- 1)\sum_{k=1}^\infty kc_k(x-1)^{k-1} = \sum_{k=1}^\infty kc_k(x-1)^{k} = \sum_{k=0}^\infty kc_k(x-1)^k.[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes Graham87

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top