Differential equations questions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving various differential equations (D.E.s) and understanding methods to derive solutions. One participant struggles with transforming the expression ln(1/[(y^2)-1]) into its simplified form, 1/2 ln[(y-1)/(y+1)], and seeks clarification on the steps involved. Another question addresses the transition from a general solution involving arbitrary constants to a specific D.E., emphasizing the need for initial or boundary conditions to fully determine the constants. Additionally, participants discuss finding a linear D.E. that has specific functions, such as x and cosh(x), as solutions, highlighting the requirement for a characteristic equation with certain roots. The conversation underscores the importance of clear problem statements and proper thread etiquette in forums.
Fritz
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
I was trying to solve a 1st order D.E. and couldn't solve this:

ln 1/[(y^2)-1] I know the answer is 1/2 ln[(y-1)/(y+1)], but could figure out how this is so.

Also, I don't understand what method you'd use to get from y = Ae^-4x + Be^-6x to d2y/dx2 +10 dy/dx +24y + 0. I can eliminate the arbitrary constants in simpler D.E.'s, but not this one! Can someone go through a logical method?


Also, ytan(dy/dx) = (4 + y^2) sec^2(x). How, in this case, would you go about separating the variables?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"Also, I don't understand what method you'd use to get from y = Ae^-4x + Be^-6x to d2y/dx2 +10 dy/dx +24y = 0. I can eliminate the arbitrary constants in simpler D.E.'s, but not this one! Can someone go through a logical method?"
Eeh, the expression for y(x) is called the GENERAL solution for the DE.
It SHALL have two arbitrary constants in its expression.
 
Zero is a perfectly good constant.

I have been looking at the first part of this problem but really do not understand the problem. Please give a concise statement of the DE. You may want to investigate our LaTex equation engine.

As for the second part simply compute the first and second derivative of the given solution, does it satisfy the DE?

To completely specify A and B you also need 2 initial or boundry conditions. Since those are not specified we can not go any further with the solution.
 
Last edited:
i need help with this problem and please explain the answer:

Find a linear DE that has x and cosh x as solutions.

thanks
 
Fady.bc said:
i need help with this problem and please explain the answer:

Find a linear DE that has x and cosh x as solutions.

thanks
In future do not "hijack" other peoples threads to ask new questions. Start your own thread.

Since cosh(x)= (ex+ e-x)/2, this is the same as asking for a linear d.e. with x, ex, and e-x as solutions. Since x= xe0, any linear d.e. with x as a solution must have characteristice equation with 0 as a double root.

You need a linear d.e. having a characteristic equation with 0 as a double root and 1 and -1 as roots.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top