Digital oscilloscope for high school use

  • Thread starter rsk
  • Start date
In summary, a digital oscilloscope for high school use is an essential educational tool that allows students to visualize electrical signals in real time. It helps them understand complex concepts in electronics and physics through hands-on experimentation. With user-friendly interfaces and varying bandwidths, these oscilloscopes enable students to measure voltage, frequency, and waveform shapes accurately, fostering practical skills and analytical thinking in a classroom setting.
  • #36
DaveE said:
Congratulations! I guess. After decades of using oscilloscopes, I have no idea what an "oscilloscope cable" is.What??? Are you asking us if things that you are actually holding in your hand fit together? Or, fit what?
Electronics isn't an entirely trial and error exercise. Some reading and/or research is nearly always required. Hint: mechanical fit isn't always the only consideration.

Anyway, what's your question here? I can't figure out your post at all.
Oscilloscope cables - the cables which (presumably) were supplied with the oscilloscope.

Regarding the other cables, they physically don't fit together. They are part of a kit with various sensors and a few interfaces, but they don't seem to be compatible. One of them seems to be exactly the reverse shape of what it should be. Just wanted confirmation that I wasn't going mad, that's all.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #37
rsk said:
Just wanted confirmation that I wasn't going mad, that's all.
Well, that's asking quite a lot... :wink:
 
  • Wow
Likes rsk
  • #38
rsk said:
Regarding the other cables, they physically don't fit together. They are part of a kit with various sensors and a few interfaces, but they don't seem to be compatible. One of them seems to be exactly the reverse shape of what it should be. Just wanted confirmation that I wasn't going mad, that's all.
We have found another interface unit which does fit the sensors we have, but interface in that picture (we have quite a few of them) don't seem to fit any of the sensors we have. Little stops
berkeman said:
Well, that's asking quite a lot... :wink:
Probably.
 
  • #39
rsk said:
We have found another interface unit which does fit the sensors we have, but interface in that picture (we have quite a few of them) don't seem to fit any of the sensors we have.
The "fit" that matters most are the electrical parameters. Were those devices designed to work with those sensors? IDK. The electronics industry tries to make connectors incompatible (i.e. mechanically won't mate) when they shouldn't be connected, but this really only works within a particular, and common, market segment, like computers.

You need to stop relying on mechanical fit as in indication of electrical compatibility. There will come a time when that will not deliver a good result. Good lab work follows research, analysis, and planning at your desk.
 
  • #40
They seem to have been bought together and are definitely from the same manufacturer, Vernier, which supplies sensors, loggers and interfaces to schools. However, as above, we have found in another box a different interface which does fit the sensors, but nothing (yet) which fits that little interface.

I appreciate what you're saying about electrical compatibilty, but a mechanical (mis)fit is a pretty good indicator of whether it was meant to be a match or not. School equipment tends to be supplied as easy click-fit to use out-of-the-box.
 
  • #41
rsk said:
They seem to have been bought together and are definitely from the same manufacturer, Vernier, which supplies sensors, loggers and interfaces to schools. However, as above, we have found in another box a different interface which does fit the sensors, but nothing (yet) which fits that little interface.

I appreciate what you're saying about electrical compatibilty, but a mechanical (mis)fit is a pretty good indicator of whether it was meant to be a match or not. School equipment tends to be supplied as easy click-fit to use out-of-the-box.
Professional EEs spend a huge fraction of their time researching components, reading documentation, and planning. Good engineering is seldom a game of trial and error, hoping for the best because it seems OK based on limited data. In my lab a part that couldn't be identified by a part number was IMMEDIATELY thrown in the trash.

However, that's not your world of teaching high school with limited resources. Good luck.

PS: I'm reminded of that old grad school joke: Several days working in the lab can save you from spending an hour or two in the library.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #42
rsk said:
I saw mention of the x10 in the probe on one of the videos
I highly suggest getting some. They add a large impedance between the things you are testing and the expensive test equipment. It takes 10 time more oops to ruin your day.

BoB
 
Back
Top