Dimension of 4x4 Matrix: Find Basis Vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter DryRun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Matrix
DryRun
Gold Member
837
4

Homework Statement


A= \begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\ 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ -1 &2 &1&0 \end{bmatrix}Determine the dimension of A and give a set of basis vectors for A.


Homework Equations


Dimension of matrix, ref form of matrix.


The Attempt at a Solution


I reduced the matrix to row echelon form and then the dimension = rank of matrix. Is that correct? I am quite confused about what dimension means. In a 4x4 matrix, maybe dimension is 16? or is it the number of non-zero matrix elements?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Easy way to remember it is:

# of columns - # of non zero rows in rref
 
So, the dimension of A is the rank of the matrix A?
 
Yes. In fact, I would consider the term "dimension of a matrix" very strange. The rank of a matrix is the dimension of the image of the matrix.
 
I think by dimension you mean "nullity" cause our lecturer also used "dimension of a matrix" which was confusing when studying from other sources.

Try plugging your matrix in wolfram and ask for nullity.

In the output it states a "dimension" which is always exactly what I always needed. So maybe that's what it means.
 
sharks said:

Homework Statement


A= \begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\ 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ -1 &2 &1&0 \end{bmatrix}Determine the dimension of A and give a set of basis vectors for A.


Homework Equations


Dimension of matrix, ref form of matrix.


The Attempt at a Solution


I reduced the matrix to row echelon form and then the dimension = rank of matrix. Is that correct? I am quite confused about what dimension means. In a 4x4 matrix, maybe dimension is 16? or is it the number of non-zero matrix elements?

How does your textbook or lecturer or course notes define the term "dimension of a matrix"?

RGV
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply . Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top