Dimensional analysis - atomic bomb explosion radius

In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between the radius of a shock wave ##R## after an atomic explosion and the elapsed time ##t##, ambient air density ##\rho_0##, and ambient air pressure ##p_0##. It is shown that ##R=\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}g(\pi_1)## where ##\pi_1## is a dimensionless variable. The attempt at a solution involves expressing ##\pi_1## as ##\pi_1 = \frac{p_0 R^3}{E}## and discussing the homogeneity of the given expression. It is determined that the given expression is not quite homogeneous, and the units of ##\
  • #1
vector
15
0

Homework Statement

:[/B]

An atomic explosion can be approximated as the release of a large amount of energy ##E## from a point source. The explosion results in an expanding spherical fireball bounded by powerful shock wave. Let ##R## be the radius of the shock wave and assume that ##R=f(E,T,\rho_0, p_0)## where ##t## is the elapsed time after the explosion takes place, ##\rho_0## is the ambient air density and ##p_0## is the ambient air pressure. Using dimensional analysis show that ##R=\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}g(\pi_1)## where ##\pi_1## is a dimensionless variable. Choose it so that it involves ##E## to a negative exponent. What is ##\pi_1##?

Homework Equations



##R=f(E,T,\rho_0, p_0)##
##R=\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}g(\pi_1)## where ##\pi_1## is a dimensionless variable

The Attempt at a Solution



The problem is that the relationship does not appear to be homogeneous. If ##\pi_1## is dimensionless, then the units of ##\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}## must be the same as the units of ##R##. However,

##[E] = ML^2 T^{-2}##
##[t] = T##
##[\rho_0] = ML^{-3}##
##[p_0] = ML^{-1}T^{-2}##
##[R]=L##, where M is express in kilograms, T is in seconds, L is in meters.

What is it that I'm not getting right here?

On the other hand, I expressed ##\pi_1## as follows: ##\pi_1 = \frac{p_0 R^3}{E}##. Is this correct?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
vector said:

The Attempt at a Solution



The problem is that the relationship does not appear to be homogeneous. If ##\pi_1## is dimensionless, then the units of ##\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}## must be the same as the units of ##R##. However,

##[E] = ML^2 T^{-2}##
##[t] = T##
##[\rho_0] = ML^{-3}##
##[p_0] = ML^{-1}T^{-2}##
##[R]=L##, where M is express in kilograms, T is in seconds, L is in meters.

What is it that I'm not getting right here?

On the other hand, I expressed ##\pi_1## as follows: ##\pi_1 = \frac{p_0 R^3}{E}##. Is this correct?

Thank you!
yes, it's correct. The dimension ##p_0 R^3## is same for E.
##ML^{-1}T^{-2}## * ##L^{3}## = ##ML^2T^{-2}##
 
Last edited:
  • #3
majid313mirzae said:
yes, it's correct. The dimension ##p_0 R^3## is same for E.
##ML^{-1}T^{-2}## * ##L^{3}## = ##ML^2T^{-2}##

Thanks. But do you think the expression given in the problem statement is correct at all? The problem is that ##R## has units of ##L##, but ##\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}## has units of ##L^{-5}##.
 
  • #4
vector said:
Thanks. But do you think the expression given in the problem statement is correct at all? The problem is that ##R## has units of ##L##, but ##\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}## has units of ##L^{-5}##.
unit of ##Et^2## is ##ML^2T^{-2} * T^2## then ##ML^2##
so unit of ##R## is ##\frac{ML^2}{ML{-3}}## = ##L^5##
 
  • #5
Sorry, I meant ##L^5##. So then the expression is not quite homogeneous. Namely, the units of ##R## are ##L##, but the units of ##\frac{ET^2}{\rho_0}## are ##L^5##. Am I correct?
 
  • #6
yes , you are. Below file can be useful
http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/42045/228875559.pdf?sequence=1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Thanks. So, the ##\frac{ET^2}{\rho_0}## should be raised to the power of 1/5, shouldn't it?
 
  • #8
vector said:
Thanks. So, the ##\frac{ET^2}{\rho_0}## should be raised to the power of 1/5, shouldn't it?

yes, it's right
 

FAQ: Dimensional analysis - atomic bomb explosion radius

1. What is dimensional analysis?

Dimensional analysis is a mathematical method used to convert units and quantities by using their dimensions. It is a powerful tool in physics and engineering to check the consistency of equations and to convert between different units.

2. What is the formula for calculating the explosion radius of an atomic bomb?

The formula for calculating the explosion radius of an atomic bomb is R = (E/P)^(1/3), where R is the explosion radius, E is the energy released by the bomb in joules, and P is the pressure in pascals. This formula is derived from dimensional analysis and takes into account the energy and pressure of the explosion.

3. How is dimensional analysis used in studying atomic bomb explosions?

Dimensional analysis is used in studying atomic bomb explosions by helping scientists understand the relationship between different physical quantities and their units. It allows for the conversion of units and simplifies complex equations, making it easier to analyze the effects of an atomic bomb explosion.

4. Can dimensional analysis be used to predict the exact explosion radius of an atomic bomb?

No, dimensional analysis alone cannot predict the exact explosion radius of an atomic bomb. It is a valuable tool in understanding the relationship between different physical quantities, but other factors such as wind, terrain, and construction materials can also affect the explosion radius.

5. Are there any limitations to using dimensional analysis in studying atomic bomb explosions?

Yes, there are limitations to using dimensional analysis in studying atomic bomb explosions. It assumes ideal conditions and does not take into account external factors that may affect the explosion radius. It is also based on mathematical models and may not accurately reflect the real-world conditions of an atomic bomb explosion.

Similar threads

Back
Top