Dipole embedded in dielectric sphere is this the best way to do this?

In summary, the conversation discusses finding the potential due to a point-like dipole inside and outside of a dielectric sphere. The potential inside the sphere is found using the standard formula for a dipole, while the potential outside is derived using Legendre polynomials and matching boundary conditions. There is also mention of using the method of images, but this is complicated for dielectrics. Another approach is to use the Green's function for the Poisson equation, but there is no closed form solution for the general case. Finally, one person provides a potential solution in spherical coordinates and suggests checking the second Maxwell equation for completeness.
  • #1
VortexLattice
146
0

Homework Statement



Hey all, I want to find the potential due to a point-like (mathematical, not physical) dipole inside and outside of a sphere made of dielectric material with dielectric ε. It's of radius R. Outside the sphere is vacuum.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Inside there sphere is easy (I think). For the potential of a dipole, we just use the standard

[itex]V(r,\theta) = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon} \frac{\vec{p}\bullet\vec{x}}{\left|x\right|^3}[/itex]

with the dielectric's [itex]\epsilon[/itex], of course. Outside the sphere, I try to build a solution using Legendre polynomials. I want them to match the boundary condition of the potential on the surface of the sphere. To find this, I note that for a point on the surface of the sphere, x is [itex]\vec{x} = sin(\theta)cos(\phi)\hat{x} + sin(\theta)sin(\phi)\hat{y} + cos(\theta)\hat{z}[/itex] and I say the dipole p is pointing in the z direction, with magnitude p. So on the surface of the sphere:

[itex]V(R,\theta) = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon}\frac{p cos(\theta)}{R^3}[/itex]

So this is what I need my solution outside to match at r = R.

So outside I want something of the form [itex]V(r,\theta) = \sum_{m = 0} ^\infty [(A_m r^m + B_m R^{-(m+1)})P_m(cos(\theta))][/itex]

But I'm looking at the outside, as r goes to infinity, so I know A = 0 for all m. So I get rid of these, and do the standard little trick to figure out the coefficients B:

[itex]B_m = \frac{2m + 1}{2}R^{m + 1} \int_0^{\pi} P_m(cos(\theta)) \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\frac{p cos(\theta)}{R^3} sin(\theta) d\theta [/itex]

Is this all I can do? Do I just find the coefficients and then that's as far as I can go? I don't think I can integrate the Legendre polynomials generally.

Also, is there a nicer way of doing it? I was thinking of something involving that trick of viewing the dipole as two point charges very close together (at a distance d), finding the field of each by using method of images, and then taking the limit as d->0. But doing method of images with dielectrics is tricky. Any advice?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi!

I don't know whether there exists a nicer solution; anyway I try to propose mine; let me know if you agree with it. As a convention, I will use spherical coordinates, with the z-axis as the axis of the dipole.
As you said, you can write the potential outside the sphere in the way you wrote it (with all A's equal to zero, A_0=0 is a convention).
Then you impose the border condition at the surface of the sphere: continuity of the component of the electric field parallel to the tangent of the surface and continuity of the component of the electric induction perpendicular to the surface:

[itex]\vec{E}_{||}^{\text{out}}=\vec{E}_{||}^{\text{in}}[/itex]

[itex]\vec{D}_{\bot}^{\text{out}}=\vec{D}_{\bot}^{\text{in}}[/itex]


So you have expressed the border condition inside the dielectric as a field which depends on the parameters B's. We now want to find the solution inside the dielectric.
Now, call [itex]\vec{E}^{\text{part}}[/itex] the particular solution of the electric field generated by an electric dipole (the usual one that is found on the textbooks rescaled by ε) and define (for points inside the sphere)

[itex]\vec{E}^{\text{new}}=\vec{E}^{\text{in}}-\vec{E}^{\text{part}}[/itex]

Now, [itex]\vec{E}^{\text{new}}[/itex] is the electric field inside the sphere in absence of free charges inside the sphere with border conditions (written in a very rough way)


[itex]\vec{E}^{\text{new}}|_R=\vec{E}^{\text{in}}|_R-\vec{E}^{\text{part}}|_R[/itex]

that is, the border conditions depend on the B's.

Now, since, for what concerns the interior of the sphere, [itex]\vec{E}^{\text{new}}[/itex] should not have any singularity (it is the electric field in absence of charges), you can write the potential inside the sphere in the same form with the Legendre polynomials; the point is that now you save only the terms for which the electric field is nonsingular in the limit r->0. You have then an expression for the electric field in terms of unknown parameters C's (the equivalent of the A's); by matching the two expressions of the electric field at the border I think you would get the answer for [itex]\vec{E}^{\text{new}}[/itex]; you then easily conclude.

Francesco
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I'm sorry, it's not really clear to me what you're doing. What would be your actual expression for the potential?
 
  • #4
You are trying to work out the Green's function for the poisson equation in and outside a dielectric sphere. Solution is in terms of spherical functions r^l*Y_{l,m} and r^{-l-1}Y_{l,m}. You'll need spherical expansion of the dipole and match the boundary conditions at the boundary, as well as at infinity. No closed form solution exist for general case. The more general Green's function for helmholtz equation is standard in textbooks on EM Green's functions, derived from Mie scattering theory. If you are looking at a conducting sphere, method of images gives closed form solution
 
Last edited:
  • #5
If I haven't made any mistake in my computations, I obtain (in spherical coordinates and with the axis of the dipole as the z axis)

1) outside the sphere the electric field is

[itex]E_r=\frac{2p}{2+\epsilon}\frac{1}{r^3}[/itex]cos[itex](\theta)[/itex]


[itex]E_\theta=\frac{p}{2+\epsilon}\frac{1}{r^3}[/itex]sin[itex](\theta)[/itex]


2) inside the sphere the electric field is


[itex]E_r=\frac{2p}{\epsilon}\frac{1}{r^3}[/itex]cos[itex](\theta)-\frac{p}{R^3}(\frac{1}{\epsilon}+\frac{1}{2+ε})[/itex]cos[itex](\theta)[/itex]


[itex]E_\theta=-\frac{p}{\epsilon}\frac{1}{r^3}[/itex]sin[itex](\theta)+\frac{p}{R^3}(\frac{1}{\epsilon}+\frac{1}{2+\epsilon})[/itex]sin[itex](\theta)[/itex]


Hope this is right and helpful.


f.


EDIT: as a first check, it seems that
a) inside the sphere the electric field is the one of the electric dipole + a zero-divergence field (the first Maxwell equation is solved);

b) idem outside the sphere;

c) the border conditions are satisfied;

the only thing that is left to check is that the second Maxwell equation is satisfied (the one wit rot[itex]\vec{E}=\vec{0}[/itex]), which I haven't done yet; please can you check? Thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #6
francesco85 said:
If I haven't made any mistake in my computations, I obtain (in spherical coordinates and with the axis of the dipole as the z axis)

1) outside the sphere the electric field is

[itex]E_r=\frac{2p}{2+\epsilon}\frac{1}{r^3}[/itex]cos[itex](\theta)[/itex]


[itex]E_\theta=\frac{p}{2+\epsilon}\frac{1}{r^3}[/itex]sin[itex](\theta)[/itex]


2) inside the sphere the electric field is


[itex]E_r=\frac{2p}{\epsilon}\frac{1}{r^3}[/itex]cos[itex](\theta)-\frac{p}{R^3}(\frac{1}{\epsilon}+\frac{1}{2+ε})[/itex]cos[itex](\theta)[/itex]


[itex]E_\theta=-\frac{p}{\epsilon}\frac{1}{r^3}[/itex]sin[itex](\theta)+\frac{p}{R^3}(\frac{1}{\epsilon}+\frac{1}{2+\epsilon})[/itex]sin[itex](\theta)[/itex]


Hope this is right and helpful.


f.


EDIT: as a first check, it seems that
a) inside the sphere the electric field is the one of the electric dipole + a zero-divergence field (the first Maxwell equation is solved);

b) idem outside the sphere;

c) the border conditions are satisfied;

the only thing that is left to check is that the second Maxwell equation is satisfied (the one wit rot[itex]\vec{E}=\vec{0}[/itex]), which I haven't done yet; please can you check? Thanks

Hmmmm, interesting. All the stuff on yours checks out, and I'd really love it if worked... However, that means one of us is wrong because solutions to Laplace's equation are unique. So I don't mean to be challenging, but can you see what's wrong with mine?
 
  • #7
VortexLattice said:
Hmmmm, interesting. All the stuff on yours checks out, and I'd really love it if worked... However, that means one of us is wrong because solutions to Laplace's equation are unique. So I don't mean to be challenging, but can you see what's wrong with mine?

I'm not so sure about what I am going to say, but anyway I try to pose two questions:

1) how do you know that inside the sphere the electric potential is the potential of the dipole? Until you don't impose border conditions on the sphere, I think that you should write the solution as V=potential of the dipole+ function which satisfies the Laplace equation

2) how do you impose the border condition between the interior of the sphere and the exterior of the sphere? At a first sight, it seems that you should impose some conditions on the derivatives of the potential.

Let me know!
Francesco
 
  • #8
VortexLattice said:
[itex]B_m = \frac{2m + 1}{2}R^{m + 1} \int_0^{\pi} P_m(cos(\theta)) \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\frac{p cos(\theta)}{R^3} sin(\theta) d\theta [/itex]

Is this all I can do? Do I just find the coefficients and then that's as far as I can go? I don't think I can integrate the Legendre polynomials generally.

If you note that

[tex] \cos\theta = P_1(\cos\theta),[/tex]

you can use orthogonality to perform this integral (there's only one nonzero term). It seems to agree with Francesco.
 
  • #9
fzero said:
If you note that

[tex] \cos\theta = P_1(\cos\theta),[/tex]

you can use orthogonality to perform this integral (there's only one nonzero term). It seems to agree with Francesco.

Whoa! I was kind of wondering about that but I didn't actually write them out and try. How can you be sure all the others integrate to zero?

That would be dandy...let me write it out.
 

FAQ: Dipole embedded in dielectric sphere is this the best way to do this?

1. How does a dipole embedded in a dielectric sphere work?

A dipole embedded in a dielectric sphere is a setup in which a positively charged particle and a negatively charged particle are placed inside a spherical dielectric material. This creates an electric dipole moment, with one end having a positive charge and the other end having a negative charge. This setup allows for the study of the interaction between electric fields and dielectric materials.

2. What advantages does this setup have over other configurations?

One advantage of a dipole embedded in a dielectric sphere is that the shape of the sphere allows for a more uniform distribution of the electric field. This can make it easier to study the effects of the electric field on the surrounding dielectric material. Additionally, the spherical shape allows for easier calculations and analysis compared to other shapes.

3. Are there any limitations to using a dipole embedded in a dielectric sphere?

One limitation is that the electric field is not perfectly uniform inside the sphere, as the charges are not located at the exact center. This can affect the accuracy of calculations and models. Additionally, the dielectric material used can also affect the accuracy of results, as different materials have different dielectric constants and properties.

4. How is this setup used in scientific research?

A dipole embedded in a dielectric sphere is commonly used in the study of dielectric materials and their interactions with electric fields. It can also be used in studies of electromagnetic radiation and the response of materials to different frequencies. This setup allows for controlled experiments and accurate measurements of electric fields and their effects on the surrounding material.

5. Can a dipole embedded in a dielectric sphere be used in practical applications?

While this setup is primarily used in scientific research, it has potential applications in fields such as materials science and engineering. For example, it can be used to study the dielectric properties of materials used in electronic devices. However, further research and development is needed to fully utilize this setup in practical applications.

Back
Top